Reserve California new system

The California Parks website is the worst we have used and we have used just about every states. When we travel in California we usually use private parks just for this reason. Chuck

Keep doing it. I forwarded this thread to their "transformation team" also.

It won't get fixed immediately, but if they realize it's affecting their customer numbers, they will do something.

toedtoes wrote:
As far as I can tell, you have to select a location first. This is the type of issue that Parks needs fo become aware of so that they can make changes to simplify it.

Yes, I have e mailed them and talked to "them" in person. I am sure my comments have gone nowhere. In the past, you still put in an initial location (i would use my zip code) and then all of the parks would be listed in order of miles away, instead of just 6 or 8. Oh well. Nothing's easy.

As far as I can tell, you have to select a location first. This is the type of issue that Parks needs fo become aware of so that they can make changes to simplify it.

Has anyone figured out how to get a listing of availability of all the parks? We are flexible and in the past, you could put in dates and be able to see all available parks. Now you have to put in a location and it gives you 8, I think. This is how we have found new parks to visit. Last year, we didn't even get to one state park. We toured other states and national parks and the reservations were simple to make and the fees much more affordable. I have almost given up on our state parks.

toedtoes wrote:

bikendan wrote:
Didn't think that the new system could be worse than Reserve America but it is.
But that's what happens when the state gov't gets involved.

IT in California gov't departments is notoriously poor.

It was contracted out to a private company - as most of these systems are. The problem is often that the private companies like to contract a set price for a specific time frame and then anything beyond that is extra. So the private company likes to draw out issues and the state ends up cutting off the contract before everything is resolved. Add that the media likes to publicize perceived "inefficiencies" so departments rush to get a final product and it's guaranteed that these IT projects are failures.

I meant to say that someone in California gov't IT is overseeing the private contractor and they will be woefully under qualified.

P.S. If folks would post their specific issues with the new system, it will be seen by Parks and may result in improvements.

bikendan wrote:
Didn't think that the new system could be worse than Reserve America but it is.
But that's what happens when the state gov't gets involved.

IT in California gov't departments is notoriously poor.

It was contracted out to a private company - as most of these systems are. The problem is often that the private companies like to contract a set price for a specific time frame and then anything beyond that is extra. So the private company likes to draw out issues and the state ends up cutting off the contract before everything is resolved. Add that the media likes to publicize perceived "inefficiencies" so departments rush to get a final product and it's guaranteed that these IT projects are failures.

Didn't think that the new system could be worse than Reserve America but it is.
But that's what happens when the state gov't gets involved.

IT in California gov't departments is notoriously poor.

Oh and try refreshing about 30 seconds before 8 am - practice on days you aren't trying for a site and make note of how early you can hit refresh for it to log in at 8 am.