Andersen Aluminum GN vs rail version

tiger275 wrote:
Hey everyone.

I have been trying to make a call on which version of the Andersen to pick for towing my OR 5er that is due next month. I have a 2018 F350 with the factory puck system as well as the GN ball option.

I see that I have 2 options...
a) use the aluminum Andersen with the GN ball. This option would require that I use the torque wrench for the install each time we tow since I will not be leaving the hitch in the truck most of the time. Not a huge deal, but certainly something that requires a little attention.
b) use the Reese picture frame adapter with the Andersen rail version. This option would allow me to permanently attach the Andersen to the picture frame and then quick install and remove the package when needed.

I guess my questions are all circulating around the pros/cons of each option.

Obviously the Aluminum/GN option will be lighter (~35#) while the other option would be slightly heavier (~100 = 50+50). But it sure seems to me that the second option would be drastically easier to deal with during install and removal.

Anyone have any experience with both setups that might offer some comments?

I have the Reese picture adapter, and the rail mount steel Andersen. I can't imagine needing anything lighter as far as install or removal.

I like the idea of a four point attachment ,both adapter ,and hitch over the gooseneck attachment with the bed supporting the hitch, instead the four points attached to the frame of the truck. Also the chance of bed deflection with the gooseneck. None of that with the rail mount.

Unless you need more then 20K , the rail mount Andersen is the way to go. As far as adapters with the Andersen , Reese is the better option as I mentioned in my previous post, the Reese is cheaper. There is NO advantage to the Demco with a rail mount Andersen, other then spending more money.