cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Andersen Ultimate not working for me

wvcampers
Explorer
Explorer
I went from a Reese 16K slider to the Andersen ultimate. My trailer was very stable with the Reese, with the Andersen the trailer is constantly moveing around. It is bad enough that can feel it and it is uncomfortable towing. I have a short bed F350 SRW CC 6.7 diesel. The camper is a 34' Cardinal. I have the Andersen in the rear position because the Cardinal has a flat nose and I need the clearance to get into my driveway. I put the Reese back in the truck and all is well. Any ideas why the trailer movement with the Andersen?
2017 F350 6.7 CC Lariat DRW
2018 Cardinal Luxury Edition 3250 RLX
80 REPLIES 80

Cdash
Explorer
Explorer
I think I am going to go measure my Superglide and run through the numbers the same way to see how similar or different it is.

IdaD
Explorer
Explorer
From a basic geometry standpoint it makes sense to me that the rail closest to the ball is going to carry more of the weight in a static (parked) situation. But once you start moving that's all out the window. Going down the highway I think the rear rail is going to take the bulk of the load regardless of which way the hitch is positioned. Hit the brakes and I bet the bulk of the load shifts to the front rail. I think this is probably also true of a standard fifth wheel hitch as well.

What would be interesting is if somebody with an Andersen hitch (like me) and some spare time (unlike me) would take their trailer to a scale and see what sort of difference the base orientation has on axle weights. My guess is the difference wouldn't be too dramatic.

Just FWIW, I have my Andersen in the exact configuration (hitch oriented back, kingpin in front of ball to my pinbox clears) and I have no issues with wagging or movement at all. Compared to my Curt slider the Andersen is rock solid. That being said, my trailer isn't very heavy (10.5k gross) and I've got 1200 lbs of Cummins sitting over my front axle so even if the Andersen does tend to shift the load toward the rear more than others it probably doesn't matter in my setup.
2015 Cummins Ram 4wd CC/SB

Cdash
Explorer
Explorer
wvcampers wrote:
I have not weighed using the Andersen to see if the weight has shifted.


Purely speculative, but I am guessing that the combination of the weight being pushed further back on the truck, combined with the distance back to the connection point for resisting lateral loads being pushed back is causing your wag. I bet it is pushed back enough that you are getting a bit of tail wagging like you could have with a bumper tow. That lateral load has more of a lever to move the truck with.

Just a guess.

I'd really be curious to see what the scale numbers with the Anderson would be. It would be cool to see you weigh with both hitches on the same day to have it at a 100% apples to apples comparison with no changes in trailer weight. I am guessing that is too much hassle though.

Cdash
Explorer
Explorer
Sport45 wrote:
Cdash wrote:
If someone can measure distance center of rail to center of rail, and distance from center of pin to center of rail, I can tell you how much more is pushed either forward or back.


Will this work?




Perfect!

I am going to reference numbers off the picture using right and left (as it is shown in the picture). The rotation of the base in the truck will determine weather the loads I provide are fore or aft of the truck axle.

Here are the numbers:

For a 1,000 pound vertical load on the ball the right rail would see 708 pounds and the left rail would see 296 pounds. Or to simplify it for a known pin weight: 70.8% of the pin load to the right rail and 29.6% to the left rail.

I think fixed fifth wheel hitches would have a 50 - 50 distribution if the pin center is centered between the rails. On sliders, the distribution will probably put the majority of the weight on the front rail. I'd have to measure to get exact numbers, but my Superglide would put the majority on the front rail.

The horizontal load, which others have pointed out will exist in any type of hitch, but giving numbers just to give you a point of reference:
A 1,000 pound horizontal load on the ball applied towards the right looking at the same picture will result in 656 pounds downward force on the rear rail and 656 pounds upward force on the front rail. If you have it at the highest (18" setting) it will be 750 pounds for every 1,000 pounds.

So putting both of these together could quickly put all the vertical pin load on the rear rail, aft of the trucks rear axle. Whether that is or will be a problem, is anyone's guess. Most seem to do fine, but if not, I would think these numbers could provide some insight. To be fair, similar things will happen with a regular fifth wheel hitch, but not to the extent of an Anderson base oriented to provide maximum cab clearance. The simple way to say it is "You can't move the load further back without the load being further back".

In reality, I don't think there is any good way to ever know what the horizontal force would be. It would depend on speed, wind velocity and direction, grade of road, alignment of axles, tire inflation, etc. If I were guessing, I would expect that horizontal load to generally be around 25% of the trailer weight, but I am just completely guessing.

So in summary, the message I would like people to think about is what they are trying to accomplish. If they are using it because physical reasons favor a lightweight hitch, great. If they are using the Anderson with the ball closer to the cab, then I don't see much potential for issues. If someone has a bit too much trailer for the truck and are trying to preserve payload by having a lightweight hitch, that is fine. But by orienting that hitch to provide maximum clearance while you are close or over on weights "could" lead to having some handling issues due to how the hitch transfers load aft of the rear truck axle. Just something to consider when making your hitch decision.

And for the record, the Pullrite Superlite hitch that is similar to the Anderson, looks to have the ball centered between the front and back rails (can't find actual dimensions to verify this), so it would load the rails more similar to a conventional hitch with a 50 - 50 front/back distribution. Te two companies are providing a similar product, but have taken different paths to the final product. I would assume that each has their reasoning for what they did.

Sport45
Explorer II
Explorer II
Cdash wrote:
If someone can measure distance center of rail to center of rail, and distance from center of pin to center of rail, I can tell you how much more is pushed either forward or back.


Will this work?


’19 F350 SRW CCLB PSD Fx4
'00 F250, CC SWB 4x2, V-10 3.73LS. (sold)
'83 F100 SWB 4x2, 302 AOD 3.55. (parked)
'05 GMC Envoy 4x2 4.2 3.73L.
'12 Edge 2.0 Ecoboost
'15 Cherokee Trailhawk

Learjet
Explorer
Explorer
I often wondered about the dynamics with the rail mount hitches in general...when you add the total drag of the trailer ( wind resistance and rolling resistance) what is the weight transfer during travel to the rear rails?

I know this doesn't' affect the dynamics of the pivot points and sway, but the center of weight distribution must move more to the aft rail during highway speeds?
2017 Ram Big Horn, DRW Long Box, 4x4, Cummins, Aisin, 3.73
2022 Jayco Pinnacle 32RLTS, Onan 5500, Disc Brakes, 17.5" tires
B&W Ram Companion

wvcampers
Explorer
Explorer
N-Trouble wrote:
Coupler mounting position is irrelevant in terms of the possible cause that is being discussed. Flip the hitch base around to put the attach point in front of axle and re-test.


I can try this, but I cannot get the camper back in my drive way if it is not in the rear position for the short bed truck, If it wont work in the rear position it wont work for me. That is why I use the slider hitch.

Looks like the Andersen will be for sale.
2017 F350 6.7 CC Lariat DRW
2018 Cardinal Luxury Edition 3250 RLX

wvcampers
Explorer
Explorer
Here is more detail. The Andersen hitch is the rail mount installed in the rear position per instructions for a short bed truck. This puts the hitch point behind the rear axel. The coupler is installed so that the ball is behind the pin. If installed in the forward position the pin box will hit the side of the truck bed when turning.
The pin box is the standard Lippert 1621 extended pin box. The truck is F350 with camper package and snow plow package 11500lb GVW. All holding tanks were empty when towing.

The truck weight empty
Front 4700
Rear 3460

With the trailer and Reese hitch
Front 4720
Rear 5760
Trailer 12160
Combined 20440

I have not weighed using the Andersen to see if the weight has shifted.
2017 F350 6.7 CC Lariat DRW
2018 Cardinal Luxury Edition 3250 RLX

Cdash
Explorer
Explorer
Bobandshawn wrote:
Cdash wrote:


The other thing could be your truck. Conventional fifth hitches put the center of pin just in front of the axle. The Anderson, especially in the rear position, is going to increase load on the trucks rear axle and decrease load on the trucks front axle. This is because more load is going towards the back legs of the Anderson. That could cause some change in handling too.

You sure that there isn't any movement in the block that attaches to the pin?



I spoke with the Anderson folks and any weight you put on the hitch will be the same as putting the weight on a fifth wheel hitch. The weight goes on the frame of the hitch which is stationary. The frame fits the truck in the same location as does a rail system. The Anderson hitch frame has no front or rear position. You can swap the pin box adapter end for end to move the trailer 4" further forward, but it still mounts to the ball on the hitch in the same location.


First, let me say that I don't doubt what they told you.

Second, I'll say I'm not sure they are 100 percent correct. Yes, the mounting points are the same, but if the center of load affects how the load is distributed to those mounting points.

From what I've seen of the Anderson, the ball is NOT centered between the front mounting rail and back mounting rail. If I'm wrong about that, ignore the rest of this. In the hitch, the majority of the weight will go to the closer support. So if the BASE is rotated to push the pin further back, that puts more than half the weight on the rear rail. If the ball is closer to the front rail, it would push more load to the forward rail. If someone can measure distance center of rail to center of rail, and distance from center of pin to center of rail, I can tell you how much more is pushed either forward or back.

Personally, I'm guessing that the tail wagging incident has the base rotated to maximize clearance, and the pull to the rear on the hitch amplifies the problem (pulling back on the ball will put even more load on the rear rail and take more away from the front rail).

My 2 pennies.

N-Trouble
Explorer
Explorer
Coupler mounting position is irrelevant in terms of the possible cause that is being discussed. Flip the hitch base around to put the attach point in front of axle and re-test.
2015 Attitude 28SAG w/slide
2012 GMC 2500HD SLT Duramax
B&W Turnover w/Andersen Ultimate 5er hitch

wvcampers
Explorer
Explorer
kyle86 wrote:
Is the coupler facing forward or rearward?

The adapter on the pin box is in the rear position.
2017 F350 6.7 CC Lariat DRW
2018 Cardinal Luxury Edition 3250 RLX

N-Trouble
Explorer
Explorer
goducks10 wrote:


Then why does it tell you in the instructions to set the hitch in one way for LB and another way for SB? Also you can put the coupler block on two ways. Page 6 in the rail mount instructions clearly tells you how to install for LB or SB.


BINGO!
2015 Attitude 28SAG w/slide
2012 GMC 2500HD SLT Duramax
B&W Turnover w/Andersen Ultimate 5er hitch

goducks10
Explorer
Explorer
Bobandshawn wrote:


If you have the rail system or the gooseneck system there is only one way to put it on correctly. Sure, you probably can turn it around, but it isn't meant to do that. The Anderson hitch that sits in the bed of the truck has one position. The king pin adapter can be moved around and being it is 4" on center there is actually an 8" difference between the forward and rearward position.

If you have the gooseneck mount version the gooseneck is in front! If it's in back the hitch is installed wrong. Look at the PDF on their website. If you have the rail system again ditto, only one way to put it on.


Then why does it tell you in the instructions to set the hitch in one way for LB and another way for SB? Also you can put the coupler block on two ways. Page 6 in the rail mount instructions clearly tells you how to install for LB or SB.

Bobandshawn
Explorer
Explorer
goducks10 wrote:
Bobandshawn wrote:
laknox wrote:



Since you've moved your hitch point further back, you've got more leverage for the FW to move the truck. It only takes a couple inches to get this. Unless I had a =very= light FW, compared to my truck, I'd never have the hitch point behind my axle center line.

Lyle


I don't think he said he mounted it further back. I imagine if he has the rail mount he could move the rails back. If it's a gooseneck type ditto, he'd have to move the gooseneck back. The Anderson has no adjustment fore and aft.


If he has the rail version then you have two positions. You can rotate the base 180* depending on whether you have an SB or LB. You can also rotate the pin coupler.
If he has the pin coupler in front of the normal pin location and has rotated the Andersen to the rear for SB cab clearance then he's compounded the situation.


If you have the rail system or the gooseneck system there is only one way to put it on correctly. Sure, you probably can turn it around, but it isn't meant to do that. The Anderson hitch that sits in the bed of the truck has one position. The king pin adapter can be moved around and being it is 4" on center there is actually an 8" difference between the forward and rearward position.

If you have the gooseneck mount version the gooseneck is in front! If it's in back the hitch is installed wrong. Look at the PDF on their website. If you have the rail system again ditto, only one way to put it on.

Bayley
Explorer
Explorer
The Anderson hitch base has only one position.....the hitch point is to the rear of the hitch base.
The adapter has two available positions......the ball opening forward of the king pin or rear of the king pin. The rear position is used to move the king pin forward to allow for more clearance in a short box bed.
The actual weight on the hitch remains the same in either position because the ball on the hitch base does not change position.
Semper Fi

Tony, Darlene & the boss Bentley!
2013 Ram CTD, Ride-Rite Air Bags, B&W Turnover Ball and Andersen "Ultimate 5th Wheel Connection".
2014 Arctic Fox 29-5K 5th wheel with Reese Airborne Pin Box.