Rant about fulltimers

Lantley wrote:

johnhicks wrote:
Well..maybe...

Once again today while perusing an RV Park Review (you know where) I came upon the statement praising the park for not allowing fulltimers "with all their junk and noise."

As I've been plotting our travels for the summer I've often read reviews denigrating the park for having fulltime/longtime campers, apparently as opposed to casual daily campers, and equating them to the Squatleys etc.

Where do they get off???

I can see why you take offense to those comments. However there is a difference between full timers who are traveling through and full time residents.
The review does not differentiate between the two.
I prefer parks that don't allow full time residents as well.
But more importantly I prefer parks that mandate clea/cleared sites without a lot of stuff lying around and no permanent structures

I'd say that as a traveler I prefer to be at parks where folks are moving in and out. It feels like we have more in common and seem more inspired to visit, chat, and share ideas and experiences.

I consider it a necessary evil to stay at parks where there are, what appears to be, full time residents. For the most part, they seem to want their privacy and keep to themselves which just isn't as fun when traveling. I totally get the socio-economic piece as well. They aren't living their to keep me entertained.