Jul-04-2014 01:13 PM
Aug-06-2014 05:08 PM
Escargot wrote:gerrym51 wrote:Escargot wrote:
Haven't "rued" the day here yet either.
PS FYI: Not all members of rv.net are boys. Thanks.
Escargot-2006 pleasure way is NOT the current sprinter van-NO modern emissions controls-No DPF etc. that is what causes most of the problems on sprinter van rv's
Apologies. I read the fore-warning of "rue the day" as a general comment regarding Sprinters, reinforced by fastpaddlers comment since we have the same PWs.
Thank you for the correction.
Aug-06-2014 03:55 PM
gerrym51 wrote:Escargot wrote:
Haven't "rued" the day here yet either.
PS FYI: Not all members of rv.net are boys. Thanks.
Escargot-2006 pleasure way is NOT the current sprinter van-NO modern emissions controls-No DPF etc. that is what causes most of the problems on sprinter van rv's
Aug-06-2014 01:03 PM
Aug-06-2014 11:48 AM
Escargot wrote:
Haven't "rued" the day here yet either.
PS FYI: Not all members of rv.net are boys. Thanks.
Aug-06-2014 10:12 AM
Aug-05-2014 09:31 PM
Aug-03-2014 05:42 PM
CASERTA wrote:
I have a 2012 MB ERA Sprinter RV. Have close to 25,000 miles and am about to get a Service B as per schedule. I am a bit shocked that the local MB dealer would want a minimum $800, and perhaps more than $1000, if the fuel filter and water separator needs to be replaced. I spoke to a non-MB mechanic and he said that he could do the Service B for $250, other than replacing the fuel filter and separator. He didn't think the vehicle, at 25000 miles, would require the fuel filter and water separator be replaced.
Could anyone comment as to whether or not they believe the fuel filter and water separator should be replaced? Does anyone have any comments as to the the MB Service B maintenance schedule ?
Thanks!
Paul
Aug-03-2014 12:33 PM
Jul-08-2014 04:42 PM
Jul-07-2014 08:03 PM
Jul-06-2014 08:23 PM
Bumpyroad wrote:avanti wrote:
It certainly doesn't matter who does the service. That would be illegal in the US.
If the service .............
but the coverage could be denied, then it would be up to the owner to bring a suit against a company with scads of attorneys on retainer.
you would have to prove that the service was done properly, not the opposite.
bumpy
Jul-06-2014 08:11 PM
Jul-05-2014 02:28 PM
avanti wrote:
It certainly doesn't matter who does the service. That would be illegal in the US.
If the service .............
Jul-05-2014 02:25 PM
Bumpyroad wrote:avanti wrote:Oilman wrote:
According to what I have read on this and other forums The Mercedes dealer is the only one who can flush the brake fluid properly. The dealer level software is used to activate the valving on the ABS unit to get the proper flush.
A flush done by a non dealer will not be able to flush the ABS unit.
I don't really know if this matters or not but this is what I have read.
I will be ready for my "B" service soon and if it weren't for that requirement I think I would just do the service myself.
There is much controversy as to how important the ABS activation thing is during a brake flush. Here is one discussion:
http://sprinter-source.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20218
A couple of things to note:
1) The brake flush is NOT part of the "B" service. It is to be done every two years.
2) Some third-party scan tools can activate the ABS system, so you may have alternatives to the dealer.
3) Many people believe that you can do a DIY purge by exercising the ABS system on a gravel road.
would failure to have this done by a MB service center with the proper equipment, etc. be cause to deny some warranty coverage.
bumpy