โDec-05-2014 04:45 AM
โDec-05-2014 10:56 PM
Effy wrote:
Oh jeez fellas. Part of the reason I bought a MH was so pasengers can enjoy the benefits of a rolling apartment. This means taking a nap whatever.
Holstein, I think it's a good idea provided you only drive as long as you are comfy. When it gets past the time where it becomes stressful, park for a while and take a nap yourself,. Again part of the benefits of owning a MH.
โDec-05-2014 09:55 PM
โDec-05-2014 08:04 PM
jfkmk wrote:Have you ever talked with anyone who has been in an accident in an RV? I have. In both cases that I know of, passengers inside the motorhome that were unbelted received NO INJURIES. One of those accidents was a head on, at ~60 mph. The second was at 40. In both cases, the occupants of the crashed car/suv died. (occupants that died were belted in) So if a car and an RV are in an accident, one is much safer unbelted in the RV than belted in the car.
If you think that, because of the mass of your vehicle, you're going to come to a gentle stop in the event of an accident, you're sadly mistaken. If you're crash at any rate of speed, you're going to be violently thrown if yours not restrained.
โDec-05-2014 06:11 PM
โDec-05-2014 06:11 PM
โDec-05-2014 11:37 AM
JimM68 wrote:jfkmk wrote:
Most, if not all, states have seatbelt laws for a good reason. If you got into a crash and one or more of your family members were injured because they were sleeping in bed instead of properly wearing their seatbelt, would you think the extra couple of hours on the road were worth it?
I hate to skip ahead, but...
I've always been a rule breaker. Nobody but the front seat passengers has ever worn a seatbelt in our rig. That includes the 3 70 pound dogs who are free to roam where they want.
My kids never owned or wore helmets on their bicycles either, now did I growing up back in the sixties.
This is the difference between the "rubber room" mentality and the "Sh!t happens" mentality.
I di not believe in protecting myself or my offspring or my pets from anything that vould possibly happen. We have a God for that.
โDec-05-2014 11:21 AM
Nutinelse2do wrote:
For us, it's just me and DH. No children, so I may have a little different perspective.
I have driven while DH was in the back sleeping, and visa versa. As long as you are diligent with your break down routine, I don't see a problem.
That's the beauty of an RV. Getting up, stretching, making a sandwich, using the bathroom, sleeping, switching drivers, all while in transit.
As kids, we survived many a family vacaction sitting in the back of a station wagon, with no seat belt. We rode bikes with no helmet, houses with no child proofing, and actually lived to tell about it.
JMO
โDec-05-2014 11:20 AM
msturtz wrote:jfkmk wrote:msturtz wrote:
. It is very different getting into a crash in a 26,000# motorhome vs. a 2000# smart car. That amount of mass will slow down and or stop much slower than a smaller amount of mass when hitting an equal sized object. This is just physics. The net effect for passengers is less effects in a crash.
That would be a great point if your 20,000# motorhome is on the road with nothing but smart cars. More likely you'll be on the road with a bunch of 80,000# semis. Get in an accident with a truck or hit a divider and your physics point is moot.
Actually, no physics isn't moot. There are far more cars on the road than trucks and truck drivers are arguably better trained than average car drivers. You are much more likely to hit a car or be hit by a car than a truck. Even fixed objects such as barriers will move when hit. Do I believe my kids are safer belted in: yes. That said I must balence reality and usability against the statistical likelihood of a major accident. We choose to limit the amount of time our kids are out of their seatbelts to the minimum possible. We choose to take the risk on the rare occasion. None of the school buses I drove had seat belts, no metro busses or private busses have seat belts. The seat belts in new motorhomes are poorly anchored in many cases and are placed in odd positions such as in a sideways mounted sofa when in an accident would only serve to transfer the effects of a collision to an occupants waist sideways likely causing significant internal injury. The dinette belts are no better because you have a fixed table right in front of you. In an accident your head (or your child's head) will slam into the table causing head injury. The safest place to be would be in a rear facing crash seat. Seatbelts have benefit in keeping the person from flying around in the coach in the event of an accident. So in short there is benefit, however limited benefit.
โDec-05-2014 11:15 AM
Executive wrote:FIRE UP wrote:
?snip/So, at the stroke of midnight, I fired the beast up, released the brake, turned the lights on and hit the "D" in the shift pad and, we were off, in about 10 seconds.
Scott
Scott.... 10 seconds huh??? Guess you didn't air up your coach or do your air pressure routine.....:W.....Dennis
โDec-05-2014 10:46 AM
DutchmenSport wrote:Nutinelse2do wrote:
...As kids, we survived many a family vacaction sitting in the back of a station wagon, with no seat belt. We rode bikes with no helmet, houses with no child proofing, and actually lived to tell about it.
JMO
As kids, we did the same thing. Unfortunately, times have changed and we've got to abide by the rules for today (not yesterday) or pay the legal consequences if we get caught.
As far as passengers and how they ride in a MH? That's the option of every driver and the risks they are willing to assume ... seat belts ... walking around ... sleeping in a bed ... And within the same family, different drivers may feel different. Each driver should be respected for their decisions, because inevitably, in the event of an accident or simply a routine traffic stop, it's the driver that has to live with the choices and options he allowed as the driver.
To the OP .. what you are proposing (in theory) sounds like a nice idea to allow your family to sleep. But my question is ... if you are on vacation, or even if you are full timing ... why be in SUCH a hurry! I REALLY think you need to enjoy an extra cup of coffee and listen to the birds chirp a little more in the morning while everyone else is sleeping! Our world is so rush-rush anyway! Slow down ... drink the coffee, listen to the birds, and smell the roses! and enjoy. RVing is not necessarily about the next event occurring in the future. It's about what's happening in the moment! Whether that be the process of trip planning, driving, actual camping, setting up, breaking camp, preparing lunches, visiting attractions, reading a newspaper or a book, it's an entire process and ALL of it is to be enjoyed ... in the moment. You are blessed to have your family... Ever consider just sitting there while they are sleeping and watch your kids sleeping and contemplate about their futures and laugh when they wiggle and move and make funny faces while sleeping? Like I suggested ... slow down and enjoy the moment. I think you're missing out on so much happening around you.
โDec-05-2014 10:37 AM
jfkmk wrote:
Most, if not all, states have seatbelt laws for a good reason. If you got into a crash and one or more of your family members were injured because they were sleeping in bed instead of properly wearing their seatbelt, would you think the extra couple of hours on the road were worth it?
โDec-05-2014 10:08 AM
FIRE UP wrote:
?snip/So, at the stroke of midnight, I fired the beast up, released the brake, turned the lights on and hit the "D" in the shift pad and, we were off, in about 10 seconds.
Scott
โDec-05-2014 10:04 AM
holstein13 wrote:
/snip/At 5:15 in the morning, I couldn't sleep and woke up and checked on the toad, disconnected the electric, pulled in the remaining slides, retracted the jacks and took off at a leisurely pace. Since there was no traffic at 5:45, I easily cruised through downtown San Antonio on our way to the next destination. We arrived at the next stop early in the afternoon with my family well rested and ready to go. I, on the other hand, was a bit tired from getting up earlier than I normally do and being stressed driving in the dark and fog for 7 hours.
holstein13 wrote:
Hold on a minute, I didn't mean to imply that I was rushing through anything. I'm just as slow and relaxed in the morning driving (if not more so) than in the late morning and afternoon. I really don't understand how leaving at 10:30 and driving 4 hours with bored kids is more relaxing than leaving at 6:30 and driving 4 hours with peaceful sleeping kids.
โDec-05-2014 08:48 AM