Forum Discussion
pconroy328
Apr 14, 2015Explorer
Just piling on as a professional nerd, i agree with everyone else who said "it depends". Not only do you need me to write software that'll thread itself over the cores, you need the OS to support it (which most modern OSs do).
But if you're memory constrained or have a slow disk, then I'll paraphrase Gary Amdahl who said "You're only going to go as fast as the slowest part..."
Said another way, it's like putting a big block 427 in a Yugo. :)
For what I do, I'm content with a 6 core chip running about 3 GHz for my desktop. I'll go for cores over GHz, but only to a point. I wouldn't go under 3.5GHz today either.
Unless I was power-constrained, then...
... yes ...
it depends. :)
But if you're memory constrained or have a slow disk, then I'll paraphrase Gary Amdahl who said "You're only going to go as fast as the slowest part..."
Said another way, it's like putting a big block 427 in a Yugo. :)
For what I do, I'm content with a 6 core chip running about 3 GHz for my desktop. I'll go for cores over GHz, but only to a point. I wouldn't go under 3.5GHz today either.
Unless I was power-constrained, then...
... yes ...
it depends. :)
About RV Must Haves
Have a product you cannot live without? Share it with the community!8,793 PostsLatest Activity: Aug 22, 2023