Frustrations with new technology...GRRRR!
I know that I gotta' keep up as technology progresses, but some things in the past that were so simple are now a huge hassle to seek and figure out. Case in point: I not only got a new computer th...
Forum Discussion
OK... I am posting this on my old computer wit the same new camera photos I downloaded as documented before.
I placed the photos on the old hard drive and used what appears to be whatever photo opening program this is as shown in the snip below:
On my old computer I am able to download from the new camera the correct rotation with respect to the position of which the camera took the image. It downloads in that correct position (rotated or otherwise.)
The program on the old computer that opens the images, open them in the correct camera position even if it is rotated. The program allows me to rotate it and then save and life is good:
So, some folks said it is my camera. Is it really the camera or the program on the new computer that makes the assumption judgment call when opening the images? I would really like the program that opens the images to open them unmolested and that way I, me, me, my interpretation can make the decision on what to do with the image.
By virtue of this experiment of doing it on my old computer makes me think it is not the camera but rather an over assertive program that opens images on my new computer. Is my logic correct?
I will still keep trying. I have yet to install BlueBeam Revu on the new computer and will set it as my default image processing and opening program... maybe it will let me have control over my own data... other wise I will change my name to "Dave" and demand a more apologetic computer based on the Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic 9000 platform. (LOL)
I placed the photos on the old hard drive and used what appears to be whatever photo opening program this is as shown in the snip below:
On my old computer I am able to download from the new camera the correct rotation with respect to the position of which the camera took the image. It downloads in that correct position (rotated or otherwise.)
The program on the old computer that opens the images, open them in the correct camera position even if it is rotated. The program allows me to rotate it and then save and life is good:
So, some folks said it is my camera. Is it really the camera or the program on the new computer that makes the assumption judgment call when opening the images? I would really like the program that opens the images to open them unmolested and that way I, me, me, my interpretation can make the decision on what to do with the image.
By virtue of this experiment of doing it on my old computer makes me think it is not the camera but rather an over assertive program that opens images on my new computer. Is my logic correct?
I will still keep trying. I have yet to install BlueBeam Revu on the new computer and will set it as my default image processing and opening program... maybe it will let me have control over my own data... other wise I will change my name to "Dave" and demand a more apologetic computer based on the Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic 9000 platform. (LOL)
