Nov-15-2019 11:22 AM
Nov-21-2019 06:12 PM
Beaker wrote:Amen, by the time they speed it up, and put in all the commercials, the movie has lost all continuity. That's one good thing about TCM channel.Does anybody know how much time the networks commit to commercials?
I did time the commercial time on Gold Rush one night-21 minutes.
If I see a movie that I like on TV, I will buy it used on Ebay for 4-5 dollars rather than watch all the commercials on TV movies.
Nov-21-2019 04:35 PM
Does anybody know how much time the networks commit to commercials?
Nov-21-2019 12:53 PM
Nov-21-2019 09:58 AM
fj12ryder wrote:T18skyguy wrote:You mean that everything on those channels/boxes you mentioned is worth watching? I really find that kind of hard to believe. So you're still paying for content you don't want/watch.
I have OTA with Roku streaming Sling, Netflix, Amazon prime. Sure, the cost may be approaching cable, but at least I'm paying for what I want to see instead of silly cable bundles with home shopping, food channel etc. I'm a news addict, so I need that on demand and am willing to pay for it.
The thing that really irritates me about cable is that I have to pay a surcharge for sports' channels. I HATE professional sports/advertising, but I cannot opt out of that surcharge. Stupid.
Nov-21-2019 09:20 AM
austinjenna wrote:I would guess that most folks are like me and have had internet a long time before going to streaming. Even with DTV I had internet so no I don't pay that internet cost for streaming.
Agreed. Most already have internet so it does not come into play.
Nov-21-2019 09:09 AM
I would guess that most folks are like me and have had internet a long time before going to streaming. Even with DTV I had internet so no I don't pay that internet cost for streaming.
Nov-21-2019 06:04 AM
T18skyguy wrote:You mean that everything on those channels/boxes you mentioned is worth watching? I really find that kind of hard to believe. So you're still paying for content you don't want/watch.
I have OTA with Roku streaming Sling, Netflix, Amazon prime. Sure, the cost may be approaching cable, but at least I'm paying for what I want to see instead of silly cable bundles with home shopping, food channel etc. I'm a news addict, so I need that on demand and am willing to pay for it.
Nov-20-2019 11:07 PM
Nov-20-2019 07:02 PM
Nov-20-2019 01:54 PM
From what I can tell, most "cord cutters" seem to totally ignore the mere fact of the cost of the Internet service that YOU directly pay for when adding up their savings.
You NEED to add that cost in to make a good comparison of services and IF you will really see any savings.. Something else to consider, Internet providers will also increase rates to cover new faster technology so don't expect your Internet cost to stay low as streaming traffic causes more congestion
Nov-20-2019 01:20 PM
wowens79 wrote:
The biggest cost for TV providers is content. This is catching up with the streaming services. They are all currently operating at a loss to gain subscribers. Once they start trying to make a profit you will see their prices come in line with cable and satellite services.
I work in the cable industry, and see the prices charged by the different channels. The margins are very small.
The streamers can be a little cheaper since they don't actually get the service to your house, they rely on your internet provider to do that. Probably 80-90% of your internet traffic is streaming video. So add $30-40 of Internet cost to that $61 for Hulu, and it gets you close the the price of cable/satellite.
So when you streamers/cable/sat prices go up, it's not just because they want more money, it's because Discovery/ABC/ESPN/HGTV etc want more money. They want more money because NFL, actors, producers, etc want more money.
Nov-20-2019 07:26 AM
Nov-20-2019 03:05 AM
Nov-20-2019 12:10 AM
Lwiddis wrote:
Hulu is in trouble IMO