Overcharge really tears it for me !
I've been a loyal supporter of CW & Good Sam; in fact, we'd had great service from the Brownsville, MI location and from the ESP -- but I can't defend them anymore! I sent the following to both CW ...
Forum Discussion
DownTheAvenue wrote:Dog Folks wrote:thestoloffs wrote:Old-Biscuit wrote:
So HOW was the issue settled??
You state they acknowledged that they do have unusual pricing....was that what you needed. An acknowledgement?
If you check CW's site today, the price on the combination cordset & inlet has been repriced to be lower than the two parts individually. You can draw whatever inference you like from that fact.
Again, all I'll say is that I'm satisfied with their settlement; I consider anything else to be between CW & me as a personal matter. In my original post, I merely stated a figure because I was quoting my original communication with them verbatim.
No disrespect meant at all, and I am glad that CW came through for you.
But you posted on a public forum, and now the settlement terms are private? :h
Is non disclosure part of the settlement? If so, you can say so, nothing wrong with that.
Yep, you hit the nail on the head. In any settlement, Camping World requires a non-disclosure document signed. That in of itself shows that Camping World does not have the customers best interest at heart. They are worried that others, knowing the terms of a settlement, will want the same thing. This shows their true colors!
I am not defending CW.
Just want to point out that the use of non-disclosure is VERY common in all types settlements with all types of companies/people.
Their use does not necessarily mean that "Camping World does not have the customers best interest at heart."
Just curious if they are using nondisclosure. It is my bet they do, but only because advised to do so by their legal team.
