Travelling with a Satellite dish and receiver

Bill.Satellite wrote:
The footprint of 2 of the 3 satellites covers the entire US and Canada.

Yes, I know. I was just trying to say that Shaw Direct receivers could be built to function only if they get all 3 signals including G1 which is Canada only.

Of course everyone would have to upgrade their LNB to 3-sat. and I don't think everyone has yet.

The signal the Shaw customers receive IS the Canadian satellite signal while they are in the US. The footprint of 2 of the 3 satellites covers the entire US and Canada. The Bell customers are out of luck as Bell readjusted their satellite beam to cover Canada only and a tad bit of the Northern US. Shaw will likely do this with future satellites eventually eliminating the full US coverage they have now, but until that happens Shaw customers just take their receiver and go.

Bill.Satellite wrote:
There is currently no way for any satellite TV provider to know the location of a receiver unless it is connected to a phone line or internet connection.

That's certainly true. HOWEVER, if they were very serious about stopping Canadians receiving outside Canada, they could construct the firmware in the receiver to function only if it is receiving signal from the sat. whose footprint is Canada only. If you're south of the 45th parallel, no workee (unless you're close and have a BIG dish).

Currently we receive signal from the sat. with the big footprint south of the 45th but they're moving a lot of the interesting channels to the other sat.

I know. Don't take it too literally.

If that's the case the answer might also be or the year after that or the year after that or the year after that.......Satellite TV is ONE WAY. There is currently no way for any satellite TV provider to know the location of a receiver unless it is connected to a phone line or internet connection.

Bill.Satellite wrote:

2oldman wrote:
Not this year. Maybe next.

What is this a response to?

The OP's question

I think he might be referring to a possible change in the Shaw footprint sometime in the future. If not that, then I have no idea.

2oldman wrote:
Not this year. Maybe next.

What is this a response to?

Not this year. Maybe next.

Shaw's footprint reaches Mexico
Bell drops off close the Canada border.