โMay-19-2017 08:00 PM
โMay-21-2017 08:06 AM
โMay-21-2017 05:48 AM
โMay-21-2017 03:00 AM
โMay-20-2017 05:24 PM
SCVJeff wrote:
I spent allot of time several years ago testing these antennas with the same or likely better gear than they were designed with, and posted the results here. Where that went I don't know. Mebbe one of the search Guru's like OLDMAN2, etc. can figure out where its hiding
โMay-20-2017 11:55 AM
โMay-20-2017 11:13 AM
ng2951 wrote:
I doubt the Jack is an significantly better than Sensars. It is a considerably better antenna on UHF, and especially VHF When the model year changed, Grand Design switched from Sensar clone (they did not have a true Sensar) to the King Jack.Sounds like GD simply cheaped' out
Next it seems the manufacturers are not QAing the antenna connections. When I discovered the Sensar clone and replaced it with a real Sensar Razor, I found the antenna connections were quite loose. If the dealership is close to the transmitters at inspection they will probably do fine. However, after driving, age, and longer distance to the transmitters not having these connectors properly locked down might weaken performance.Weak in the mount is one thing. But loose and moving around can and does break the solder tab on the board its mounted to
At the home QTH I am easily close to 50-60 miles from the transmitters which will magnify any problems.This is precisely the issue. The Batwing is simply a better antenna than Jack, or any of the others out there, and fringe coverage is where this will show up. Even with an external amp attached, you cannot amplify what cannot be heard in the first place. Thats why you ALWAYS start with the best antenna, then work forward. The system works OK, and better than the bat wing clone.
โMay-20-2017 10:08 AM
โMay-20-2017 08:05 AM
โMay-20-2017 06:35 AM
โMay-20-2017 05:31 AM
โMay-20-2017 05:05 AM
โMay-20-2017 12:39 AM
โMay-19-2017 11:17 PM
โMay-19-2017 09:02 PM