dons2346
Thanks for the reply. If that's the way the law or the deed is written then that is the rule, but it seems to violate the intention of the law. The law is saying "We are concerned that people may live in a structure that is not worthy of full-time use." But the restriction is saying "We also don't want you to be able to use the land more than half the year for no good reason." The law can't prohibit you from taking your RV to another park or at least another state or country and living in it 365 days per year, unless they get the United Nations involved. I'm being a little exaggerated, but not much. I might really consider buying lots in two parks to have nice affordable year-round RV living, and the government isn't really protecting us with those rules. It sounds more like something motivated by some business interests in the final analysis. Free market capitalism in bed with government.
Steve