โSep-09-2014 04:29 PM
โSep-10-2014 03:47 PM
โSep-10-2014 03:46 PM
sonora wrote:hotbyte wrote:
When camping on "unimproved" land, how do you get to the spot where you are going to camp? Do you just drive through the forest or across the desert?
Yes that is exactly what you do in many of the talked about places out west.
โSep-10-2014 03:33 PM
SkiMore wrote:FunnyCamper wrote:
geez, lets see. it is for the people. to be for use only from the people. as a country wide gift for the people. it is 'making' money by leases for grazing, mineral rights etc.
come on. sheeple to the max!
you can forget it 'being free' or anything else in the near future. they are putting in alternative energy applicatons on it. they are going to be 'sure' NO ONE in the future will be able to use it. all that free use land. will be 'corralled' into 'sections' by 'pay to enter'.
geez...see the light. BLM is making sure in the end they control it all.
with bucks, leases and more.
freedom. there is not any! And ya'll with some bucks in your pockets say who cares. I can afford $10 to enter. why not? I use it.
missed the whole POINT of what BLM is all about. All those in favor of paying are what scares the heck out of me in this world ๐
I don't know the history of the BLM. Sometimes things change. All of the National Parks were free at one point. They were a gift to us. You need to pay now. Things change. Yes, they give you a lot more than the BLM. I'd hope that the yearly pass to use BLM land would be pretty cheap.
The tax base is going away and they need to find money somewhere. The politicians lower taxes on the 1% and make it possible for big corporations to do fancy accounting and not pay taxes. Vote for a change.
โSep-10-2014 01:09 PM
fla-gypsy wrote:
We are freaking doomed
โSep-10-2014 12:59 PM
โSep-10-2014 12:50 PM
FunnyCamper wrote:
geez, lets see. it is for the people. to be for use only from the people. as a country wide gift for the people. it is 'making' money by leases for grazing, mineral rights etc.
come on. sheeple to the max!
you can forget it 'being free' or anything else in the near future. they are putting in alternative energy applicatons on it. they are going to be 'sure' NO ONE in the future will be able to use it. all that free use land. will be 'corralled' into 'sections' by 'pay to enter'.
geez...see the light. BLM is making sure in the end they control it all.
with bucks, leases and more.
freedom. there is not any! And ya'll with some bucks in your pockets say who cares. I can afford $10 to enter. why not? I use it.
missed the whole POINT of what BLM is all about. All those in favor of paying are what scares the heck out of me in this world ๐
โSep-10-2014 12:40 PM
FunnyCamper wrote:
geez, lets see. it is for the people. to be for use only from the people.
โSep-10-2014 11:16 AM
FunnyCamper wrote:
ya'll are giving in and giving up
why pay when it is 'for the people' and 'was put aside for the people', to be 'used by the people' as something we are entitled to.
heck no to taxes or fees on 'what we deserve as ours'
sad state of affairs. pay to live on every single piece of land in this world. WE pay 6 times taxes on everything basically by the time it gets in your hands ๐ ๐ who is anyone kidding here?
easy to say for those who have some bucks in their pocket.
not one ounce of land to ever live a life without the 'cost of dollars'.
sorry to the max!
by 'some' the world will never be free of the cost. THEY line their pockets and bank accts everyday with other's monies.
โSep-10-2014 10:43 AM
โSep-10-2014 10:35 AM
SkiMore wrote:
If you are using the land you are getting value out of it. Why don't you want to pay for what you are using? Do you really think it will be a lot of money to use BLM land to park an RV? Go camp on Bundy land - I'm sure he will be cool with it.
I know you are frustrated by pork spending. VOTE. Get involved. Get those people out of office. The pork is going to happen unless you stop it. The people getting rich off the pork will keep it going unless you vote to make it stop. Cutting off the government money will just cut funding from things you use and won't effect pork.
โSep-10-2014 09:48 AM
โSep-10-2014 09:18 AM
โSep-10-2014 08:21 AM
Roman Duck wrote:
That's fine, as long as the funds that are collected are used for the lands, and not some pork!
โSep-10-2014 06:53 AM
DiskDoctr wrote:
There is no such thing as "Federal Lands"
Only DC is permitted to be under ownership of a non-state entity.