Feb-08-2014 01:50 PM
Feb-18-2014 01:48 PM
mich800 wrote:4x4van wrote:
While I see the point of banks watching for unusual activity, in many cases it has gone too far. During the summer months, we go to the Colorado River several times for weekend trips. I fuel up before we start out in Banning, CA., then drive 150 miles to Blythe. However, I then cross the river into Arizona to top off the motorhome and fill the jetskiis and gas cans. Every single time, my bank locks down my debit card. The "suspicious" activity is the fact that my card is being used in AZ just a few hours after using it in CA. However, if I drive from Banning to Morro Bay, there is no "suspicious" activity, even though I am now using my card 300 miles away from my earlier use, vs only 150 to AZ!
So 150 miles is suspicious, but 300 isn't? Not only that, when they block my card, my wife's card (same account) will often still work, but my daughter's card (different account, but "linked" to my wife's card) gets blocked even though it was NOT used earlier in CA. To make matters worse, the station has a dollar limit per transaction, and I will generally need 2 or 3 transactions to get everything filled up. It often will work for the first transaction, but THEN block it for the second.
I have even had the bank representative try to tell me that I was spending too much money on gas when I called to get the card "unblocked"! Really? As if it is any of her or the bank's business what I spend MY money on! Another told me that my card wasn't "blocked", it just had a "temporary hold" on it. I asked her to explain the difference between a "block" and a "hold" when I was sitting at the pumps with several other RVs behind me waiting for me to finish getting gas.
I'm sorry, but my bank is not my "mommy" and I shouldn't have to OK my travel plans with "her" before I can spend MY money. With today's technology, banks should be able to send a text and/or recorded message that suspicious activity was detected and that if they don't hear back from us within a certain time frame verifying the activity THEN the account will be frozen. There is no reason, nor excuse, for them to block, freeze, "hold" my account without first notifying me that they are going to do so.
You do not need to call the cc companies unless you never use your card outside a specific area. The CC companies have very sophisticated fraud algorithms. I travel for work and never had a problem. But I did have my card compromised once and they caught it right away.
Feb-10-2014 05:44 AM
Feb-10-2014 03:57 AM
Feb-10-2014 03:37 AM
Feb-09-2014 04:30 PM
Feb-09-2014 04:25 PM
Feb-09-2014 08:29 AM
Feb-09-2014 08:19 AM
Feb-09-2014 07:57 AM
Feb-09-2014 07:45 AM
4x4van wrote:
While I see the point of banks watching for unusual activity, in many cases it has gone too far. During the summer months, we go to the Colorado River several times for weekend trips. I fuel up before we start out in Banning, CA., then drive 150 miles to Blythe. However, I then cross the river into Arizona to top off the motorhome and fill the jetskiis and gas cans. Every single time, my bank locks down my debit card. The "suspicious" activity is the fact that my card is being used in AZ just a few hours after using it in CA. However, if I drive from Banning to Morro Bay, there is no "suspicious" activity, even though I am now using my card 300 miles away from my earlier use, vs only 150 to AZ!
So 150 miles is suspicious, but 300 isn't? Not only that, when they block my card, my wife's card (same account) will often still work, but my daughter's card (different account, but "linked" to my wife's card) gets blocked even though it was NOT used earlier in CA. To make matters worse, the station has a dollar limit per transaction, and I will generally need 2 or 3 transactions to get everything filled up. It often will work for the first transaction, but THEN block it for the second.
I have even had the bank representative try to tell me that I was spending too much money on gas when I called to get the card "unblocked"! Really? As if it is any of her or the bank's business what I spend MY money on! Another told me that my card wasn't "blocked", it just had a "temporary hold" on it. I asked her to explain the difference between a "block" and a "hold" when I was sitting at the pumps with several other RVs behind me waiting for me to finish getting gas.
I'm sorry, but my bank is not my "mommy" and I shouldn't have to OK my travel plans with "her" before I can spend MY money. With today's technology, banks should be able to send a text and/or recorded message that suspicious activity was detected and that if they don't hear back from us within a certain time frame verifying the activity THEN the account will be frozen. There is no reason, nor excuse, for them to block, freeze, "hold" my account without first notifying me that they are going to do so.
Feb-09-2014 05:57 AM
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be
Douglas AdamsFeb-09-2014 05:51 AM
Feb-09-2014 04:28 AM
Feb-08-2014 08:14 PM