Large dog

Frank55 wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. Our goal is to work at least one season in Yellowstone and leaving a large dog inside a trailer seems inhumane to me. Neither of us perfer to have a dog in our house now, let alone inside a trailer with less than 300 sq.feet.

Well, you got me confused :h You ask about a large dog ,yet you don't want one in the house or RV. Just wondering where you planed to keep it. I guess better yet what were your wife's plans with that shepherd . I believe the post above, pretty much hit the nail on the head, you have answered your question .

when you travel with dogs your job is to make them part of the family and take them with you, no matter what size they are.

This past summer, we have seen two separate RV's with a mastiff. Over 150# of dog. I am not sure what RV one of them was in as they were walking the dog and I didn't think to ask, but the other said he had a toy hauler and the toy box was the dog's kennel. (The one I didn't ask about the size of the RV said the mastiff was his new wife's FIRST DOG.)

Today in Vegas at Bass Pro there was group rasiing money for dog shelter or something. A large Golden Retriever with them walked ukp to me and nuzzled wanting his ears scratched. he wouldn't let anyone else near him other then the person he was with. I should have conversed about his availability.He would have been a great friend. Not sure how it would have worked out in our cramped coach, until we head for home though. I would drive the hundred mile back there tomorrow if they would still be there.

Frank55 wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. Our goal is to work at least one season in Yellowstone and leaving a large dog inside a trailer seems inhumane to me. Neither of us perfer to have a dog in our house now, let alone inside a trailer with less than 300 sq.feet.

And that my friend is your answer, forget the dog. I'm a dog guy and travel with a 60# Staffordshire Bull Terrier and the one with the doggie bags with my folding money. :W

The problem with most of these insurance bans is in the way they handle mixed breed dogs. They will require you to identify the mixed breed dog as a combination of two and only two breeds. They will not accept "shepherd mix" but they won't accept "shepherd/lab/chow/poodle/golden" either. Instead they require you to choose two of those breeds. So you choose "shepherd/lab" and everything is good. But if you choose "shepherd/chow", they say the dog is banned. It's the same dog with the same risk.

This is the biggest problem with breed bans. They are based on appearance and a simplified understanding of genetics.

My rescue group took in two sibling puppies. They were at least husky and shepherd. The male looked like a husky and acted like a shepherd. The female looked like a shepherd and acted like a husky. People saw the "shepherd" and expected a dog like their beloved shepherd - loyal, dedicated, eager to please. It was extremely difficult to get them to accept that she was not that shepherd. She was always thinking how to outsmart you, she got bored easily and found things to occupy her mind, and she didn't care if you liked it or not. I turned down many a home because they couldn't see past her appearance.

Genetics means that the puppies get half the dna from mama and half from papa. But each puppy gets those halves randomly. Add in that few dogs are just one or two breeds and that causes even more differences. So you can have three puppies from the same litter and all three will be different. One may have more chow appearance but more lab personality. Another may have more beagle looks and personality. And the third may have the coat of a lab, the shape of a beagle, the scenting instincts of a beagle, and the protectiveness of a chow. But they are all the same mix breed. Which do you ban? The standard is to ban by appearance - so you've banned the dog with the lab personality and accepted the dog with the chow protectiveness. Which is more likely to bite due to "breed"???

Lantley wrote:

JoeH wrote:

Lantley wrote:
I have a 85# dog, that is on the so called banned list. (More lunacy)
Anyway he is no harder to deal with than a small dog. As long as you train the dog it is not an issue. Large or small they both require care, exercise and training.

Unfortunately, the banned list is being mandated by liability insurance carriers. We had a rental complex and over the years, the insurance carriers started to require that certain sizes/breeds not be allowed. In today's litigious society you need to have insurance, and in order to have the insurance you have to restrictions, that's the way it works.

While I don't dispute what your saying. The one time I was not allowed to check in due to my dog. I simply drove 1 mile away to the next CG where they gladly took my money.
Seems silly one CG declares my breed is dangerous while the CG down the road could care less.

When we shopped for homeowners insurance a while ago, some companies had a list of breeds that was ridiculously excessive. Even though we don't presently have a dog, I won't purchase from a company like that. I don't patronize companies with unreasonable policies and procedures. If that is what they are like when I'm purchasing a policy, how are they going to act if I file a claim.

WE have an 85 lb Labrador Retriever.She loves people and is friendly with other dogs. Most Labs are like that. She is a great traveler,sleeps most of the time when on the road.German Shepards can be great dogs if raised right and trained right. I would suggest getting a puppy and take it to obedience school where it can socialize with other dogs and people. Make sure you socialize it with little kids too.As far as scratching the floor,we have never had a problem with that. Keep their nails trimmed and you can always put a runner down in the walking area.Dogs are great companions. I like most dogs better than most people!

We travel with 2 x 75 lb. Weimaraners. They love traveling with us. Yes, it can be a problem with potty breaks but I need one more than they do.

Also, walking them is sometimes inconvenient to what I want to do, usually sleep.

But we take them when we sight see or eat out, leaving them in the truck with the windows down and a water bowl.

When we are going to want to do something where we cannot take them, we will have located a kennel for them and made reservations well in advance. That way we know what shots are required before we leave home. The dogs love staying at the kennel as we make sure they get "daycare" privileges to play with the other dogs.

The pleasure and feeling of security we get having them with us far out weighs any inconvenience they may cause.

JoeH wrote:

Lantley wrote:
I have a 85# dog, that is on the so called banned list. (More lunacy)
Anyway he is no harder to deal with than a small dog. As long as you train the dog it is not an issue. Large or small they both require care, exercise and training.

Unfortunately, the banned list is being mandated by liability insurance carriers. We had a rental complex and over the years, the insurance carriers started to require that certain sizes/breeds not be allowed. In today's litigious society you need to have insurance, and in order to have the insurance you have to restrictions, that's the way it works.

While I don't dispute what your saying. The one time I was not allowed to check in due to my dog. I simply drove 1 mile away to the next CG where they gladly took my money.
Seems silly one CG declares my breed is dangerous while the CG down the road could care less.