โJan-22-2016 03:33 PM
โJan-24-2016 04:59 PM
ryegatevt wrote:Dutch_12078 wrote:DutchmenSport wrote:
I was in college 40 years ago. I took a sociology class. I don't remember a whole lot about that class (let alone anything from my college days. :B But this one thing I do remember and it stuck with me all these years, and I'll probably never forget.
The professor told us about an experiment that was conducted where 2 mice were put into a confined space. More than adequate and spacious for the 2 mice. They were given constantly the same amount of food, more than enough to last several lifetimes.
They let the 2 mice live in this confined space and they began to multiply. But the space remained the same, and the quantity of food remained the same.
After several generations of reproducing, the confined space began to get crowded, but the quantity of food never changed.
Eventually, the space became over populated. The food remained the same. Eventually, there wasn't enough food for all of them as the supply remained the same. The mice turned on each other, started killing each other. Kill their young, and literally killed themselves off until there was only 1 mouse left.
Sad story but true.
We talked about world population and what could possibly happen. Of course 40 years ago, everyone in the class thought this concept was impossible. That our society would never revert to barbarism, that we were too cultured.
Here we are 40 years later, and the population has mushroomed beyond belief. I've watch corn field and bean fields turn into apartment complexes and shopping malls, replacing a patch of ground that once produced food, now gone, and a building sitting there. I miss the days of my childhood when we could roam the field for hours and never see another living person.
Makes me wonder where we're headed?
The big difference is that modern farming efficiency and crop genetic improvements have drastically increased the per acre yield. Less growing space, yes, but higher output more than makes up for it. In 1936 for example, the average yield was 26 bushels of corn per acre. Today it's in excess of 160 bushels per acre and still increasing.
True, BUT - too much of the grain production goes into ethanol, increasing grain price and decreasing the amount for food and animal feed. Hence, perhaps we're back where we started...
โJan-24-2016 08:47 AM
โJan-24-2016 05:48 AM
โJan-24-2016 05:17 AM
โJan-24-2016 05:03 AM
Dutch_12078 wrote:DutchmenSport wrote:
I was in college 40 years ago. I took a sociology class. I don't remember a whole lot about that class (let alone anything from my college days. :B But this one thing I do remember and it stuck with me all these years, and I'll probably never forget.
The professor told us about an experiment that was conducted where 2 mice were put into a confined space. More than adequate and spacious for the 2 mice. They were given constantly the same amount of food, more than enough to last several lifetimes.
They let the 2 mice live in this confined space and they began to multiply. But the space remained the same, and the quantity of food remained the same.
After several generations of reproducing, the confined space began to get crowded, but the quantity of food never changed.
Eventually, the space became over populated. The food remained the same. Eventually, there wasn't enough food for all of them as the supply remained the same. The mice turned on each other, started killing each other. Kill their young, and literally killed themselves off until there was only 1 mouse left.
Sad story but true.
We talked about world population and what could possibly happen. Of course 40 years ago, everyone in the class thought this concept was impossible. That our society would never revert to barbarism, that we were too cultured.
Here we are 40 years later, and the population has mushroomed beyond belief. I've watch corn field and bean fields turn into apartment complexes and shopping malls, replacing a patch of ground that once produced food, now gone, and a building sitting there. I miss the days of my childhood when we could roam the field for hours and never see another living person.
Makes me wonder where we're headed?
The big difference is that modern farming efficiency and crop genetic improvements have drastically increased the per acre yield. Less growing space, yes, but higher output more than makes up for it. In 1936 for example, the average yield was 26 bushels of corn per acre. Today it's in excess of 160 bushels per acre and still increasing.
โJan-23-2016 02:46 PM
โJan-23-2016 11:40 AM
โJan-23-2016 09:11 AM
โJan-23-2016 08:44 AM
tenbear wrote:
I am in the NE, for people who don't know where Vermont is, and I love the 4 seasons. I would hate it being summer all year long. This time of year we have skiing, snow mobileing and lots of other great things. Summer we have reasonable temperatures for lots of outdoor activities.
I think I'll stay here, with the occasional trip to the south to remind me how much I like the north.
โJan-23-2016 08:33 AM
โJan-23-2016 08:04 AM
Coach-man wrote:Lynnmor wrote:
Every time the south gets blowed to pieces with a hurricane, they get money from the taxpayers. Will I get a check now?
When Hurricane Andrew demolished my house, I went to the FEMA office they set up in the area. I was asked two questions, 1.) Do you have a job? 2.) Do you have insurance? The answer to both wasYES! They told me to please leave and make way for people who need help! KEEP IN MIND I WAS HOMELESS, had no place to go! Now tell me about all the money we get after a hurricane!
โJan-23-2016 06:40 AM
โJan-23-2016 06:21 AM
โJan-23-2016 06:04 AM
Lynnmor wrote:
Every time the south gets blowed to pieces with a hurricane, they get money from the taxpayers. Will I get a check now?