cptqueeg wrote:
When you start publishing for public consumption about over 2 million people dying, you better be a little closer than off by 2.1 million lives.
That estimate was from London. I'm sure the 2.2M was what they felt would happen w Trump in charge after he said cv19 was going to disappear by April. In reality that estimate opened people's eyes to the potential disaster had we continued sitting on our hands.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svrxYLvJYto
Instead many mayors and governors stepped in and slowed the spread.
QUOTING FUNCTION MESSED UP...........
You think they fudged the numbers because Trump is in charge? Please!
The mayors and governors are exactly who should have stepped in to provide local control base on their local information. If a state does not take responsibility then the feds should step in. I am not sure why so many think it should be different.
