cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Voting in South Dakota may change

Community Alumni
Not applicable
Take a look at South Dakota SB 124 and HB 1232



JimR
11 REPLIES 11

2oldman
Explorer
Explorer
Well, Governor Noem is an election denier.
"If I'm wearing long pants, I'm too far north" - 2oldman

Bumpyroad
Explorer
Explorer
they could do the same that Imus did with his ranch, take an acre of SD soil, mark off and sell 1/100th of an acre plots .
bumpy

Community Alumni
Not applicable
2oldman wrote:
JimR wrote:


I posted the bill numbers so you could go look for yourself.
R
yeah I figured out that much. But one is about religion and the other about education. You can't just post a sentence?


2oldman I did the same the ones you are looking at are from 2021 about religion and something else

The two bills are about voting in SD HB 1232 redefines residency requirements for voting

SB 124 Seems to be instructions to the county auditors on how to handle /issue voter registrations


Google: SD SB 124 2023 and click on the introduced link
HB 1232 2023 and click the link there also

JimR

rk911
Explorer
Explorer
ronharmless wrote:
rk911 wrote:
as i understand , the gist is that only those who have real property in South Dakota, not just a mailing address, will be allowed to vote.


Sort of, the gist is the address has to be a real residential address....

that would be real property. wonder why the changs?
Rich
Ham Radio, Sport Pilot, Retired 9-1-1 Call Center Administrator
_________________________________
2016 Itasca Suncruiser 38Q
'46 Willys CJ2A
'23 Jeep Wrangler JL
'10 Jeep Liberty KK

& MaggieThe Wonder Beagle

time2roll
Explorer II
Explorer II
ronharmless wrote:
rk911 wrote:
as i understand , the gist is that only those who have real property in South Dakota, not just a mailing address, will be allowed to vote.
Sort of, the gist is the address has to be a real residential address, not the local laundromat.
What you have against a laundromat?

cnbc.com/i-live-inside-a-laundromat-in-nyc-for-1850-a-month.html

Gooma
Explorer
Explorer
Sounds reasonable to me.

ronharmless
Explorer
Explorer
rk911 wrote:
as i understand , the gist is that only those who have real property in South Dakota, not just a mailing address, will be allowed to vote.
Sort of, the gist is the address has to be a real residential address, not the local laundromat.

2oldman
Explorer
Explorer
JimR wrote:


I posted the bill numbers so you could go look for yourself.
R
yeah I figured out that much. But one is about religion and the other about education. You can't just post a sentence?
"If I'm wearing long pants, I'm too far north" - 2oldman

rk911
Explorer
Explorer
as i understand , the gist is that only those who have real property in South Dakota, not just a mailing address, will be allowed to vote.
Rich
Ham Radio, Sport Pilot, Retired 9-1-1 Call Center Administrator
_________________________________
2016 Itasca Suncruiser 38Q
'46 Willys CJ2A
'23 Jeep Wrangler JL
'10 Jeep Liberty KK

& MaggieThe Wonder Beagle

Community Alumni
Not applicable
2oldman wrote:
I must have missed what either of these have to do with voting.


I posted the bill numbers so you could go look for yourself.

Be sure to look at the 2023 version

JimR

2oldman
Explorer
Explorer
I must have missed what either of these have to do with voting.
"If I'm wearing long pants, I'm too far north" - 2oldman