Forum Discussion
fj12ryder
Sep 28, 2014Explorer III
I've checked them out side-by-side and I'll stand with you and by your assertion Ken White.
"Since it takes a LR-E LT to obtain the carrying capacity of a LR-D ST, it should be no surprise that the LT would be "heavier"."
Why would that be "no surprise"? Please explain the "reasoning" behind that statement? Are you equating strength to weight?
And what's with the quotation marks around heavier? Are you saying that you mean heavier in an ironic sense?
"Since it takes a LR-E LT to obtain the carrying capacity of a LR-D ST, it should be no surprise that the LT would be "heavier"."
Why would that be "no surprise"? Please explain the "reasoning" behind that statement? Are you equating strength to weight?
And what's with the quotation marks around heavier? Are you saying that you mean heavier in an ironic sense?
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,192 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 26, 2025