Electric Propulsion Reality Check

MEXICOWANDERER wrote:

joebedford wrote:
The statements in your clicky may be true, but Radio Free Asia is hardly an unbiased source.

The coal in china is a rather low-grade of bituminous. I sm going to end my participation in this discussion by stating the following...

Recreational Vehicles are considered by many in Congress to be the mortal enemy of a green society. Their evil eye has not fully focused on this yet. When the attacks come, it will be in the form of punitive taxes. How would you like a thousand dollar energy surtax on the purchase price? Or a thirty dollar a day tax on USFS campground stays?
radical congresspeople want RVs to disappear. They will legislate them out of existence. They do not RV -- all they care about is their world of wacky ideas. And it is not based on intelligence.

The quote in red above is a snippet from Wikipedia. I thought it to be economically concise. It's in agreement with dozens and dozens of USA studies, world studies and Chinese admissions which china desperately wants to suppress.

"Some people are more equal than others"

If you disagree

"Take the midnight train to Tokyo or Brussels"

We done

David ... I'm disappointed that you're done. :( Your observations and viewpoints are often rich in eventual truths.

All that many in Congress care about is their -> low work output, high prestige, high salaried, and great heathcare plan ... jobs.

I suspect that RVs will be real popular when the first and final - or next to the first and final - world catastrophe occurs. Already thousands, or hundreds of thousands(?), folks full time live in RVs. Just wait until the rest of us can no longer live in our homes/apartments/tents due to the catastrophe ... RVs may be priceless, then, if they have enough fuel left in their tanks to somehow escape the affects of the catastrophe.