โJul-14-2013 10:42 AM
โJul-15-2013 05:56 AM
rving4us wrote:
...I merely ask a specific question as to the difference of a regular generator to an inverter type. ...
โJul-15-2013 04:48 AM
โJul-14-2013 06:22 PM
โJul-14-2013 05:12 PM
โJul-14-2013 05:10 PM
Gdetrailer wrote:
...
As far as inverter, the OP IS COMPARING the need of a traditional old school non inverter gen or do they need an INVERTER TYPE of gen to "safely" run stuff.
The answer is NO, you DO NOT NEED and INVERTER TYPE GEN to "safely run stuff".
2oldman, your post is actually adding confusion to the mix.
What you SHOULD HAVE STATED is running an inverter FROM BATTERY for TV is "more efficient".
....
Running directly from the gen is less wasteful PROVIDED the gen is multitasking like charging the batteries and or running the A/C.
As far as noise, well using an inverter from batteries is the quietest way to play a TV but is not THE MOST EFFICIENT THING TO DO. BUT THAT IS NOT THE QUESTION THE OP ASKED.
โJul-14-2013 04:32 PM
2oldman wrote:SaltiDawg wrote:By 'efficient' I mean that powering a 100w TV with a 3500w generator is like swatting flies with a bazooka. Especially with a non-inverter generator that runs full bore all the time, like the Champion. You may also have to turn up the TV sound at night because of the generator noise.
Just out of curiosity, how is an inverter more efficient than a generator in powering a TV - or anything else?.
You can do it, yes, but it's not a common sight in most boondock places I've been to. And the neighbors really won't like it. Many CGs have generator hours too, so, for TV watching an inverter is really the way to go.
โJul-14-2013 04:07 PM
2oldman wrote:
Wow.. I thought I was a nit-picker. You also said "no hassle intended."
โJul-14-2013 04:00 PM
โJul-14-2013 03:14 PM
2oldman wrote:SaltiDawg wrote:I answered your question. The op is not around.
You've seemingly answered some different question. No?
โJul-14-2013 03:13 PM
SaltiDawg wrote:I answered your question. The op is not around.
You've seemingly answered some different question. No?
โJul-14-2013 02:41 PM
2oldman wrote:SaltiDawg wrote:By 'efficient' I mean that powering a 100w TV with a 3500w generator is like swatting flies with a bazooka. Especially with a non-inverter generator that runs full bore all the time, like the Champion. You may also have to turn up the TV sound at night because of the generator noise.
Just out of curiosity, how is an inverter more efficient than a generator in powering a TV - or anything else?.
You can do it, yes, but it's not a common sight in most boondock places I've been to. And the neighbors really won't like it. Many CGs have generator hours too, so, for TV watching an inverter is really the way to go.
โJul-14-2013 02:02 PM
โJul-14-2013 01:55 PM
SaltiDawg wrote:By 'efficient' I mean that powering a 100w TV with a 3500w generator is like swatting flies with a bazooka. Especially with a non-inverter generator that runs full bore all the time, like the Champion. You may also have to turn up the TV sound at night because of the generator noise.
Just out of curiosity, how is an inverter more efficient than a generator in powering a TV - or anything else?.
โJul-14-2013 01:28 PM
JiminDenver wrote:
Since I use solar to recharge, a inverter is extremely efficient, quiet and it burns no fuel. Last year when we did use the Champ for charging, it charged a battery that ran everything the rest of the day. Running a 3500/4000 just to watch TV isn't all that efficient.