pianotuna wrote:
S Davis wrote:
pianotuna wrote:
S Davis wrote:
The thing I like is they will take every amp I throw at them until fully charged unlike other chemistries that charge slower at the top
Except that 100% state of charge is NOT a goal for li.
I didn’t say 100% state of charge, i said fully charged. Maybe I consider mine fully charged at 90%.
You may wish to consider 85% instead of 90% if you want maximum cycles.
It doesn't matter to me as Li are not in my temperature zone.
Well, here’s where actual user application and seasoned experience kinda, sorta matters - For instance, IF 85% is better than 90, then should we also assume that 80% is better than 85, and so on …(ad nauseam…)…One would like to think that this point is rather self evident, but from my perspective, what’s being ‘implied’ per caveat (while avoiding the explicit) is that a LFP ought not be fully charged (do so at your own RISK!!), and this is in fact patently False…But haven’t we seen this tactic elsewhere before?? (I’m starting to wonder, was this the design behind this thread??) - sadly, seasoned LFP posters have witnessed this pattern here before!)…And this is precisely how mythologies get launched (and re-launched!), to grow ‘plausable’ legs…
So say of the 3,000 to 5,000 cycles LFP’s are ostensibly capable of delivering (say with competent charging), does anyone worry about how many cycles will be lost by charging to a what I’d call a mere 90% versus 85?….Really??
This is where a few ‘determined’ FLA folks, unable to wrap their minds around LFP, inoculate themselves from empirical reality…
3 tons
