โSep-25-2015 05:22 PM
โSep-30-2015 04:18 PM
โSep-30-2015 01:28 PM
Lynnmor wrote:
The surfaces look pretty normal. The brake lining should be cleaned with chlorinated (not the new enviro-friendly stuff) brake cleaner. You might try the method Mex mentioned.
โSep-30-2015 11:59 AM
โSep-30-2015 11:44 AM
โSep-29-2015 05:37 PM
ktmrfs wrote:
you do have an oddball. normally the alko 4400lb has 10" brakes. From what my good supplier friend told me, the 4400lb alko's use a 5200lb tube, but normally 10" brakes, and an oddball spindle and either a 5 or 6 lug wheel. Bearings and spindle are bigger than the 3500lb but NOT the same as the 5200's which uses the same spindle and bearings as the 6000lb and I believe 7,000lb axles. In that case you have a spindle and bearings capable of handling way more load than they will ever see. That's one advantage to the 5200lb axles.
BTW alko documents do show the PM for the bearings, seals, etc.
so, either you have a 4400lb axle with 5200 brakes or 5200lb axles with 4400lb springs which is a configuration available from Alko.
When I upgraded one trailer from alko 4400lb axles/springs to 5200, their where mulitple spring options, from 4400lb all the way up to 6000lbs. I went with 5200lb springs.
Once you know the bearing number you can compare to alko's list for spindles and verify you have a 5200lb tube AND spindle. I suspect that is the case since normally the 12" brake backing won't fit onto the 4400lb spindle, the bolt pattern is different.
โSep-29-2015 03:37 PM
myredracer wrote:jodeb720 wrote:
As it turns out I ordered two new axles (6000#) not AlKo's to replace my 4400#'s because I can't get parts for the 4400's correctly!
AlKo was bought out by Dexter last year FWIW... I think that's part of the problem.
The learning process continues. Our axles are marked "4400 lb". As you probably discovered, bearing and other part numbers don't exist for 4400 lb axles. Just found out that the rating applies to the weakest part on the assembly, which is the springs. So it's the springs that makes the rating, but the axles are actually 5200 lb ones which explains why the brakes are 12". Now to just verify the correct part numbers for bearings.
Am actually glad to find that we have 5200 lb axles. They are waaay stronger than what would have normally been used on our make and model.
The mud is a little clearer now. :R
โSep-29-2015 01:28 PM
โSep-29-2015 12:36 PM
โSep-29-2015 12:01 PM
jodeb720 wrote:
As it turns out I ordered two new axles (6000#) not AlKo's to replace my 4400#'s because I can't get parts for the 4400's correctly!
AlKo was bought out by Dexter last year FWIW... I think that's part of the problem.
โSep-29-2015 11:40 AM
โSep-29-2015 11:03 AM
Lynnmor wrote:
Is that some kind of step on the magnet face? A closeup of that and the drum armature would help.
As you know, I replaced the Al-Ko brakes and drums with Dexter, because of considerable grooves in the armature face.
Grooves
The photo doesn't really show how bad it is. There was only about 7000 miles of light use at this point. No way could I trust to do another 10,000 miles this summer.
โSep-29-2015 09:23 AM
Lynnmor wrote:
Is that some kind of step on the magnet face? A closeup of that and the drum armature would help.
As you know, I replaced the Al-Ko brakes and drums with Dexter, because of considerable grooves in the armature face.
Grooves
The photo doesn't really show how bad it is. There was only about 7000 miles of light use at this point. No way could I trust to do another 10,000 miles this summer.
โSep-29-2015 07:31 AM
โSep-29-2015 07:07 AM