Jul-23-2022 08:41 AM
Aug-25-2022 04:48 PM
Aug-11-2022 10:26 AM
Aug-10-2022 05:29 PM
PButler96 wrote:Sorry. I was referring to the floor which is the issue on this thread. I think you knew that though. Foam cores in walls so long as they have enough tubing in them are not an issue, as the "foam" doesn't carry a load.Huntindog wrote:
I have had four Rvs.
A 79 Prowler, 2001 Wilderness, 2010 Sabre, and 2021 Momentum. None of them are foam core construction.
I hav a few friends that had RVs using that construction. They all had problems. They all sold them and got something that did not use foam core construction.
I have read of some that repaired theirs. I have little faith in the durability of those fixes.
I think RVs built that way should be avoided
I read some years back that the industry did a study that found that the average new towable RV owner used it 2-3 times a year for 3 years and never used it again. Some sold them, others just parked them.
That really explains why some are not built to last.
You might want to look closer at the wall construction of your 2021 Momentum, then revise your comments. The 2010 Sabre would of had laminated foam core walls also. Is your glass half full or half empty.
As far as laminated floors they can be good or bad. The biggest factor is #1 the amount of and spacing of the aluminum tubing and #2, the process used for lamination, either pinch rolling or vacuum bonding. Forest Rivers Rockwood and Flagstaff lines had the laminated floor down to a science. Close spacing on the aluminum sub frame and vacuum bonded. Even then they still had some issues especially if the buyer was of great bulk. They went to a plywood floor in 2018/19. The reason was not floor quality, but that it's simply cheaper both material and laborwise to just screw down some 5/8" plywood. There was also a big deal back around the early 2010s where a lot of manufacturers had received a bad batch of the glue used in the lamination process from a supplier which added to the bad rap.
Aug-09-2022 07:38 AM
Moderator edit to post pictures. I used This picture posting app to do the job. It was developed by one of our moderators to easily post properly sized pictures here.
Aug-09-2022 07:35 AM
Jul-29-2022 01:43 AM
Huntindog wrote:
I have had four Rvs.
A 79 Prowler, 2001 Wilderness, 2010 Sabre, and 2021 Momentum. None of them are foam core construction.
I hav a few friends that had RVs using that construction. They all had problems. They all sold them and got something that did not use foam core construction.
I have read of some that repaired theirs. I have little faith in the durability of those fixes.
I think RVs built that way should be avoided
I read some years back that the industry did a study that found that the average new towable RV owner used it 2-3 times a year for 3 years and never used it again. Some sold them, others just parked them.
That really explains why some are not built to last.
Jul-28-2022 04:02 PM
Jul-25-2022 06:22 AM
Gdetrailer wrote:
Snip... Foam core by it's self is not totally at fault, it is the heart of every single RV built since the 1970s.
snip....
Jul-24-2022 07:47 PM
Huntindog wrote:
Some have stated that this unit has a foam core construction of the wall AND floor. IOW, no studs. A lot of units, generally lite weight ones are going to this construction.Faster, cheaper and has good R values... Those are the good points. Fixability? not so much. I would never buy a unit with that construction.
Jul-24-2022 06:21 PM
Gdetrailer wrote:Some have stated that this unit has a foam core construction of the wall AND floor. IOW, no studs. A lot of units, generally lite weight ones are going to this construction.Faster, cheaper and has good R values... Those are the good points. Fixability? not so much. I would never buy a unit with that construction.Beatfarmer wrote:
There’s no such thing as “a little bit of damage”. Whatever you can see is just the tip of the iceberg. I’d imagine if you can see that much drop in the wall, the actual damage is much more widespread and will most likely go up into your roof. Damage to a structural support is something I wouldn’t want to try and deal with.
My suggestion is to see if you can get anything for it on a trade in for a new camper.
A little over the top dramatic, are we?
Damage can be widespread or local, no way of knowing what you have until you open up the can-o-worms.
Either damage can be fixed, it is more about how much time and money you are willing to toss in.
Chances are, OP simply needs to find and remove damaged material back to good studs in the floor and wall edges. Then it is the matter of bridging the repair areas by "sistering" new material in place and correcting the damaged metal frame part.
Takes time to do this but chances are if OP is handy with basic carpenter tools like circular saw, jig saw, nails and hammer and perhaps drill/screw gun they should be able to make at least a good enough repair to continue using the RV.
Telling one to sell or trade is pretty extreme without seeing in person and getting a good assessment of the damage.
Typical RV building techniques, the floor is built on the frame, the walls then sit on the flooring and the roof sits on the walls. A failure of the floor studs at the edges allows the walls to sag. To stop the walls from sagging you need to address the reason the floor edge failed.
Jul-24-2022 11:50 AM
Beatfarmer wrote:
There’s no such thing as “a little bit of damage”. Whatever you can see is just the tip of the iceberg. I’d imagine if you can see that much drop in the wall, the actual damage is much more widespread and will most likely go up into your roof. Damage to a structural support is something I wouldn’t want to try and deal with.
My suggestion is to see if you can get anything for it on a trade in for a new camper.
Jul-24-2022 08:59 AM
Jul-24-2022 03:47 AM
Jul-24-2022 03:28 AM