cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

3.21 vs 3.55

puma_28db
Explorer
Explorer
Ram has built a number of 1500s, 5.7 hemi's with the new 8spd trans. Some or most of them have the 3.21 gears. The tow rating is about 2,000lbs less than the same truck with 3.55s regardless if the truck has the 6 or 8 speed.

1. Would the 8spd have more/better lower gear ratios than the 6speed?
2. With the trucks frame and engine the same, is the only facter changing tow rating the axel ratio?
3. Would towing the extra 2,000lbs with the 8spd/3.21 combo adversly affect the trans?
4. Yes tow/haul would still be used. does the 2 extra gears in the 8spd make up for the 3.21s in the rearend?
8spd with 3.21. 6speed with 3.55
1st. 4.71 vs 3
2nd. 3.14 vs 1.67
3rd. 2.1 vs 1.5
4th. 1.67 vs 1
5th. 1.29 vs .75
6th. 1 vs .67
7th. .84
8th. .67
5. Would the 8speed be suited to pull better with the lower gear ratios?
12 REPLIES 12

bimbert84
Explorer
Explorer
APT wrote:

It will be a good improvement over the 5-6spd Dodge has called their trans for over 10 years. I never liked those ratios.

I agree. I had a 2003 Ram 1500 with the Hemi which was plenty strong -- the weak spot was always the gearing.

-- Rob
2013 F-150 SCREW 4x4, 3.5L Ecoboost, 3.73, 7650# GVWR, 1826# payload
2004 Springdale 295BHL, 31'5", 7300# loaded
Hensley hitch

APT
Explorer
Explorer
Ram 8-spd with 3.21 is a little better than current 6-spds from GM/Ford with 3.73. gear 1-6 are about like gears 1-5, the main towing gears for current gassers. It will be a good improvement over the 5-6spd Dodge has called their trans for over 10 years. I never liked those ratios.
A & A parents of DD 2005, DS1 2007, DS2 2009
2011 Suburban 2500 6.0L 3.73 pulling 2011 Heartland North Trail 28BRS
2017 Subaru Outback 3.6R
2x 2023 Chevrolet Bolt EUV (Gray and Black Twins)

Tystevens
Explorer
Explorer
GMT830 wrote:
Lower gears are always better for towing.


Of course this isn't true. One must consider the whole package, not just the gears in the differentials!

For example, my 3.42-geared '10 Suburban tows far better than my '05 4.10 geared Suburban ever did. Even though both trucks have the same engine, the same torque, etc (the '10 does have 30 more ponies). Why? Because the ratios in the 6-spd transmission in the '10 are better situated to move the load.
2008 Hornet Hideout 27B
2010 Chevy Suburban 1500 LT, Z71 package, 5.3/6A/3.42
2015 Ford F150 XLT Supercrew, 2.7 Ecoboost/6A/3.55 LS

Prior TVs:
2011 Ford F150 Ecoboost 3.5
2006 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Duramax LBZ
2005 Chevy Suburban 1500 4x4 LT, 5.3/4A/4.10

Tystevens
Explorer
Explorer
The final ratios on the 8 spd look pretty good. But I would want to know more about why the difference in ratings between the packages. I don't know much about RAM, but with Chevy, the 3.42 gears often come with a heavier transmission cooler, engine oil cooler, etc. It isn't just the gears, but the whole package that bumps up the tow ratings over the standard equipment.

The ratios may be fine, but if you don't have anything to cool the transmission, you can get into trouble just the same.
2008 Hornet Hideout 27B
2010 Chevy Suburban 1500 LT, Z71 package, 5.3/6A/3.42
2015 Ford F150 XLT Supercrew, 2.7 Ecoboost/6A/3.55 LS

Prior TVs:
2011 Ford F150 Ecoboost 3.5
2006 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Duramax LBZ
2005 Chevy Suburban 1500 4x4 LT, 5.3/4A/4.10

APT
Explorer
Explorer
I agree with Rob, the 8-spd will do to the 6-spds what the 6-spds have done to the 4-spds.

As for the extra 2000 pounds of tow ratings, you probably should not be looking at towing more than 7000 pounds loaded with the Ram half ton. It's got major payload problems.

My 3/4 Burb has 3.73 axle and 0.67:1 6th gear. Unloaded, it doesn't shift into 6th until 50mph, and that's a little slow for the gear. I wouldn't want 3.55 or 3.21 with that top gear.
A & A parents of DD 2005, DS1 2007, DS2 2009
2011 Suburban 2500 6.0L 3.73 pulling 2011 Heartland North Trail 28BRS
2017 Subaru Outback 3.6R
2x 2023 Chevrolet Bolt EUV (Gray and Black Twins)

bimbert84
Explorer
Explorer
It's easy enough to figure it out. Just multiply the ratios to get a comparison:

8 speed with 3.21:
1st 4.71 * 3.21 = 15.12
2nd 3.14 * 3.21 = 10.08
3rd 2.10 * 3.21 = 6.74
4th 1.67 * 3.21 = 5.36
5th 1.29 * 3.21 = 4.14
6th 1.00 * 3.21 = 3.21
7th 0.84 * 3.21 = 2.70
8th 0.67 * 3.21 = 2.15


6 speed with 3.55:
1st 3.00 * 3.55 = 10.65
2nd 1.67 * 3.55 = 5.93
3rd 1.50 * 3.55 = 5.32
4th 1.00 * 3.55 = 3.55
5th 0.75 * 3.55 = 2.66
6th 0.67 * 3.55 = 2.38

I think the 8-speed will provide a noticeably better towing experience. It provides about 50% more torque in 1st gear and about 70% more in 2nd, which will get the load moving much easier. The 8-speed also has much better spacing. The 6-speed has a big jump from 1st-2nd, and a big jump from 3rd-4th, but the jump from 2nd-3rd is almost nothing.

-- Rob
2013 F-150 SCREW 4x4, 3.5L Ecoboost, 3.73, 7650# GVWR, 1826# payload
2004 Springdale 295BHL, 31'5", 7300# loaded
Hensley hitch

GMT830
Explorer
Explorer
Lower gears are always better for towing. And the Hemi builds better power much higher in the RPM range.
Lena - 02 Yukon XL Denali
TT - Wilderness 29L

puma_28db
Explorer
Explorer
ktosv, i was thinking the same about better torque out of the 8spd. the tow/haul button is supose to lock out the top two gears in both trans. i think that ram has posted tow ratings on the axle ratio, not the trany. the 8spd is so new they might not have enough real world data with the hemi. thank you all that have replyed.

ktosv
Explorer
Explorer
It appears from the numbers you posted, an 8 speed with a 3.21 has better torque multiplication than a 6 speed with a 3.55 or even 3.73 all the way up to 6th (gear to gear). It isn't until 7th gear that the 3.21 would be worse then a 3.73 in 5th gear. But at that point you drop the 8 speed to 6th and are better.

It may just be a dependability thing that Ram doesn't want you towing say 9000# in 8th gear with the 3.21 axle (while a 3.55 axle will do it easier).
Kevin and my...
Wife and six kids
2017 Suburban (5.3L/6A/3.08)
6x12 Enclosed Utility

Sold...2011 Express 3500 (6.0L/6A/3.42)
Sold...2010 Passport Ultra Lite 2910

maxwell11
Explorer
Explorer
it would depend on what you are going to use the truck for!!!!!

if your trailer is close to the max tow load of the truck, then go with the 3.73.

if fuel mileage in your main goal, then go with the other ratio.

my dodge diesel has the 3.73 ratio, but it has 310hp and 610# of torque, so with the 3.73 it can pull anything that I have ever hooked to it with no problem.

your truck will have more hp, but when you really load up and take off up a hill, you need torque.

torque is king when towing!!!!!

BenK
Explorer
Explorer
With today's close ratio automatics, the diff can now be a MPG ratio

Close ratio to allow the ICE to spin within it's most optimal range and
also has double over drive

What really matters is the 'effective' ratio at the tire contact patch to pavement

So your posted tranny gear ratio's is out of context without the diff ratio
and the simple math is to factor both the 3.21 and 3.55 to see them side by side


My dream manual tranny is a NV4500 and here are it's ratios and might even
change my 4.1's to something in the 3's...along with an inline over drive

1st 6.34 1993 or 5.61 after 1993
2nd 3.44
3rd 1.71
4th 1.00
5th 0.73

reverse 6.34 (1993) 5.61 (1994 on)
-Ben Picture of my rig
1996 GMC SLT Suburban 3/4 ton K3500/7.4L/4:1/+150Kmiles orig owner...
1980 Chevy Silverado C10/long bed/"BUILT" 5.7L/3:73/1 ton helper springs/+329Kmiles, bought it from dad...
1998 Mazda B2500 (1/2 ton) pickup, 2nd owner...
Praise Dyno Brake equiped and all have "nose bleed" braking!
Previous trucks/offroaders: 40's Jeep restored in mid 60's / 69 DuneBuggy (approx +1K lb: VW pan/200hpCorvair: eng, cam, dual carb'w velocity stacks'n 18" runners, 4spd transaxle) made myself from ground up / 1970 Toyota FJ40 / 1973 K5 Blazer (2dr Tahoe, 1 ton axles front/rear, +255K miles when sold it)...
Sold the boat (looking for another): Trophy with twin 150's...
51 cylinders in household, what's yours?...

bmanning
Explorer
Explorer
Looking at the ratios you've posted I would think the 8sp would have a pretty big advantage at getting a load moving...the 4.71-3.14-2.1 first 3 ratios seem pretty well suited to getting from 0-40mph which IMO is the real-world performance that's most important.
BManning
baking in Phoenix :C
-2007 Volvo XC90 AWD V8
4.4L 311/325 V8 6sp Aisin loaded
6100lb GVW 5000lb tow
-1999 Land Cruiser
4.7L 230/320 V8 4sp A343 loaded
6860 GVW 6500lb tow
RV'less at the moment