mich800 wrote:
ShinerBock wrote:
Old-Biscuit wrote:
Simply a matter of 'Classification' ----No mystery involved
I was looking for an explanation from those people on how a truck with less GAWR can have a higher GVWR.
I am confused by this statement. Does this have to do with your post on another thread. Because you gave no examples like this here. All combined axle limits were higher than GVWR. Unless I miss read something.
Or are you making comparisons between different trucks. Because if you are, if you are not bald now you will be trying to rationalize this variance.
No, my point is why does a truck that has less front GAWR, less rear GAWR, and less combined GAWR have a higher GVWR. Basically I am asking why does a truck with a 12,500 combined GAWR have a 10k GVWR while a truck that only has an 11,940 combined GAWR have an 11.5k GVWR?