โJan-02-2023 12:07 PM
โJan-19-2023 02:01 PM
Grit dog wrote:LOL,thanks but I can't afford to live in the PNW! Interesting and sad that you think you are able guess my politics by my posts about climate change. Maybe ask yourself why one of our political parties became anti-science.:hshelbyfv wrote:nickthehunter wrote:LOL thank you for reinforcing my point!;)shelbyfv wrote:Are you talking about conspiracy theories like J6?
Nope, you won't find even one legitimate source that disagrees with what the EPA has published in that link. You can't believe in facts and science and deny climate change (or the net benefits of EVs) when virtually all scientists acknowledge it. As for kool aid, it seems to me that climate change deniers often embrace a plethora of other conspiracy theories.
You should move to some nice liberal sanctuary city like Seattle or Philly or at least have to deal with the c rap of living in a blue state if youโre going to continually bash conservatives.
Itโs super hypocritical to be able to reap the benefits of living in a nice conservative state/environment and yet bash everything that it stands for.
Put your money where your mouth is and come enjoy all the things you โloveโ on the far left coastโฆ.
Might change your mind if you had to live itโฆ
Lol
โJan-19-2023 12:03 PM
shelbyfv wrote:nickthehunter wrote:LOL thank you for reinforcing my point!;)shelbyfv wrote:Are you talking about conspiracy theories like J6?
Nope, you won't find even one legitimate source that disagrees with what the EPA has published in that link. You can't believe in facts and science and deny climate change (or the net benefits of EVs) when virtually all scientists acknowledge it. As for kool aid, it seems to me that climate change deniers often embrace a plethora of other conspiracy theories.
โJan-19-2023 09:29 AM
nickthehunter wrote:LOL thank you for reinforcing my point!;)shelbyfv wrote:Are you talking about conspiracy theories like J6?
Nope, you won't find even one legitimate source that disagrees with what the EPA has published in that link. You can't believe in facts and science and deny climate change (or the net benefits of EVs) when virtually all scientists acknowledge it. As for kool aid, it seems to me that climate change deniers often embrace a plethora of other conspiracy theories.
โJan-19-2023 08:56 AM
shelbyfv wrote:Are you talking about conspiracy theories like J6?
Nope, you won't find even one legitimate source that disagrees with what the EPA has published in that link. You can't believe in facts and science and deny climate change (or the net benefits of EVs) when virtually all scientists acknowledge it. As for kool aid, it seems to me that climate change deniers often embrace a plethora of other conspiracy theories.
โJan-19-2023 08:32 AM
RambleOnNW wrote:map40 wrote:
D
Pardon, I read your omission of hydro as serious. Norway and Sweden have ample hydro resources and Norway will be building a 100% green hydrogen pipeline to Germany. Sweden is already producing 100% green hydrogen steel at their Hybrit plant and shipping to Volvo.
โJan-19-2023 08:04 AM
map40 wrote:
D
โJan-19-2023 07:22 AM
โJan-19-2023 07:04 AM
RambleOnNW wrote:map40 wrote:
Green: produced with renewable energy. The most expensive production method and the most inconsistent as wind and solar are not constant. For this reason Green hydrogen production normally uses also fosil fuel when renewable energy is not available to keep the production equipment running otherwise the investment never pays off. This forces Green hydrogen to produce between 25 to 50% of Carbon emmisions than Fosil Fuel production because they run 25 to 50% of the time on fosil fuel.
Not sure where you got this definition but it is false. Green hydrogen is only green if it is made with renewable energy. If there is some fossil fuel involved then it is termed โlow carbonโ. And you forgot the renewables hydro and geothermal power, which of course have 100% availability. And hydro is inexpensive power.
There are multiple types of electrolyzers, PEM, alkaline, and solid oxide. Of the 3 only PEM can ramp its power input rapidly up and down to follow fluctuations in renewable power input.
There is also โpinkโ hydrogen which is that produced using nuclear power.
โJan-19-2023 06:26 AM
free radical wrote:
Heres one for hydrogen fans
For some reason it never made onto any tv news
https://youtu.be/LH8GYsVl81Y
โJan-19-2023 06:14 AM
map40 wrote:
Green: produced with renewable energy. The most expensive production method and the most inconsistent as wind and solar are not constant. For this reason Green hydrogen production normally uses also fosil fuel when renewable energy is not available to keep the production equipment running otherwise the investment never pays off. This forces Green hydrogen to produce between 25 to 50% of Carbon emmisions than Fosil Fuel production because they run 25 to 50% of the time on fosil fuel.
โJan-19-2023 06:04 AM
free radical wrote:
Heres one for hydrogen fans
For some reason it never made onto any tv news
https://youtu.be/LH8GYsVl81Y
โJan-19-2023 04:28 AM
JRscooby wrote:
And we keep hearing "green hydrogen". Are you talking about methods of production, or the color? Does it store different than blue? Or Red?
โJan-19-2023 02:07 AM
free radical wrote:
Heres one for hydrogen fans
For some reason it never made onto any tv news
https://youtu.be/LH8GYsVl81Y
โJan-19-2023 12:51 AM
โJan-18-2023 06:26 PM