Forum Discussion
- A rock and a hard place - veto the decision, and it sets a very bad precedence for selling stolen property.
Allow it to go through, SK may simply turn towards the Chinese and other large EV markets. In the end it'll only hurt electrification in the US, though upholds IP protection. philh wrote:
time2roll wrote:
Welcome, Ford, to the club of insufficient batteries. Tesla and others have battled this for over a decade.
And it's going to get worse, a lot worse.
I think China and South Korea will be stepping up to the plate in a big way in the next two years. Even to the point that supply might outstrip demand in the next couple years. After that it’s anybodies guess.
Toyota for the most part is sticking with hydrogen for the most part although they have some limited plans for a few BEV’s. and course they will continue with their hybrid plan.
Volkswagen is going to have to get serious making their own batteries in bigger amounts if they want to stay on top.
It’s going to be an interesting decade.time2roll wrote:
Welcome, Ford, to the club of insufficient batteries. Tesla and others have battled this for over a decade.
And it's going to get worse, a lot worse.- Here is another link for those of us who have used up our free articles on Bloomberg.
https://www.automotivelogistics.media/electric-vehicles/sk-innovation-banned-from-the-us-for-10-years-following-lg-lawsuit/41581.article - Welcome, Ford, to the club of insufficient batteries. Tesla and others have battled this for over a decade.
Reisender wrote:
2oldman wrote:
You can edit a title.
1. Done.
2. I’m a moron. Duh.
I didn't see the original, but trust me, you are far from the first, or only person ever to make a mistake on this forum.- Time for “Let’s Make a Deal!”
2oldman wrote:
You can edit a title.
1. Done.
2. I’m a moron. Duh.- You can edit a title.
- Ford is lucky that SK Innovation is allowed to sell stolen goods for 4 years.
I expect that someone may overrule this. Essentially approving the selling of stolen property.
