โMay-02-2017 09:18 PM
โMay-08-2017 10:25 AM
โMay-07-2017 09:58 PM
โMay-07-2017 03:30 PM
burningman wrote:
All 3500 with Cummins came with the D80, even autos. It was only the 2500s that got the D70 if they had an auto.
The auto, junk in stock form, is actually the strongest transmission, IF you put all the now-available aftermarket upgrades in it.
The 5 speed has a correctible issue with the nut holding 5th gear coming off.
You should google that and read up about it, and I'll assume you know about the Killer Dowel Pin on the 12 valve. Google that and correct it asap if not.
Take care of those two things, then you've got the most reliable pickup ever built.
We're still learning what fails over time on the new ones. And there's a whole lot more things to fail on them!
The newer trucks have AAM axles that are even stouter. You won't be over what your Danas can handle but if you want, you can even put those in. The front bolts in, the rear just needs its spring mounts relocated a bit. Shock mounts are same. You'll also need new wheels, larger diameter. Then you have the bigger brakes too.
"Buy a $70,000 new truck" isn't the only answer, if you'd rather turn a few wrenches and not blow enough money on a pickup truck to go to Hawaii... ten times!
โMay-07-2017 03:12 PM
โMay-07-2017 01:00 PM
burningman wrote:
In certain model years, the F450 had a Dana 60 front axle and a Dana 80 rear.
Guess what a '97 Dodge 3500 has? Same thing.
The new trucks are not physically larger. Any stability improvement is a function of the springs, shocks and sway bars. There is no other black magic in the current trucks.
If he puts big springs, good shocks, and a big bar on that Dodge, it will haul that camper. And being a 12-Valve Cummins with zero electronics, it will keep doing it longer than any other. There are very good reasons people hang onto those trucks.
If you want bigger brakes, you don't have to buy a $70,000 new truck. The later and larger discs will bolt into that truck, people do it all the time. But the truth is the original ones in good shape and an exhaust brake will do the job fine.
โMay-07-2017 12:52 PM
okan-star wrote:
When I linked it, it was still for sale , listed for 19700.00
That model was almost the same as the EC 1160 , but the dry un- optioned Wt was just under 4000 lbs , the 1160 is about 700 lbs more
Okanagan`s weights I found to be true , they had to ship them across the border and declare each campers weight
Okanagan was a solid well built camper
โMay-07-2017 10:47 AM
โMay-07-2017 10:01 AM
โMay-06-2017 04:03 PM
okan-star wrote:
Heres the one that started the rear slide thing , built by the guy who builds EC now , heavy , but not nearly as the triple slide by Host -EC- Chalet , I`d love to have this camper , wood frame - which is not heavier than alum , I`d jump on this if I was looking
โMay-06-2017 03:54 PM
Grit dog wrote:
^From what I just looked up, the old Lance 900 is somewhere around 3000lbs wet and loaded. If that is the case, you're looking at a whole different animal if you're talking triple slides, or even a large single slide unit. Anywhere from 4500lbs min to 6klbs on the big end.
I'm far from being the weight cops too, but I'd temper my expectations of a 20 year old pickup, even though it's a dually and try to stay on the lower end of that spectrum. Like sub 5klbs.
Plenty of roomy dry bath campers with a single slide that will fit your truck. I don't think the Mammoth or other double/triple slide campers are in your trucks wheelhouse.
โMay-05-2017 10:43 AM
โMay-05-2017 08:41 AM
โMay-05-2017 05:51 AM
FrankShore wrote:
Lance is a best bet!
โMay-04-2017 11:38 PM