nickthehunter wrote:
Reisender wrote:
NamMedevac 70 wrote:
Here's Why Major Car Manufacturers Believe Hydrogen Cars Are The Future
BY
EUGENIA AKHIM
PUBLISHED 10 HOURS AGO
We delve into the reasons why several car giants are pursuing the hydrogen avenue of cars for the future instead of electric-powered vehicles.
Above very recent news article from Google news and hotcars.com
As a member of the 300 million gasser club, I will wait for my hydrogen fuel car. I am in no hurry. Evidently EVs are now old news. Wink Wink (this is a joke for the slow ones)
According to business news most EV owners till own a gasser. Maybe hidden away for rainy day????
I quit reading after they said this. LOL. :).
“Another drawback to EVs is their charging time, which is too slow. The average electric car (60 kWh battery) takes 8 hours to charge from empty-to-full with a 7kW charging point. Meanwhile, the Tesla Model S (Long Range) takes up to 12 hours to charge using the Tesla Wall Connector, while the Audi E-Tron needs 10.5 hours to charge, accordingy to Kelley Blue Book. Conversely, hydrogen cars require just 3 to 5 minutes to charge a full tank.”
LOL. Can’t get more wrong that that. :). Or funnier. :). I mean they could have used a 3 KW charge point and then said it took 24 hours. Or maybe a 1 kw charge point and then said 100 hours. Wonder why the chose 7 kw. Lucky number? :). LOL.
Cheers.
Maybe they chose 7kW because that’s what most EV’s available today will accept in at home use.
Clicky
Maybe. But I f you are going by that metric than that is incorrect as most closer to 8 kw or above.
Second of all, why compare a public hydrogen station than you would think that they would want to compare to a DC fast charge station. And most EV’s sold today charge at up to 170 KW, and a typical charge session for most EV’s is 20 minutes, not 12 hours. As well, talk to anyone who has filled a hydrogen car and it’s more like a 10 minute process not 5 minutes. Weird story.
Jmho.