Sep-26-2016 01:41 PM
Sep-28-2016 02:06 PM
Sep-28-2016 10:40 AM
Sep-28-2016 10:23 AM
hohenwald48 wrote:
When I took off the 1 year old shackles to install the MorRyde's the plastic bushing were completely worn thru and the holes in the shackles were about 1/8" bigger than the bolts.
My $40K, 8,000 pound TT has the same factory suspension design as my $300 utility trailer that's rated for like 500#. Go figure.
Sep-28-2016 10:12 AM
Sep-27-2016 04:42 PM
hohenwald48 wrote:
Yeah, I noticed you took it into account. I just didn't get it deleted quick enough. 🙂 I fixed the same problem with a MorRyde wet bolt and heavy duty shackle kit.
Sep-27-2016 03:52 PM
Lynnmor wrote:hohenwald48 wrote:Lynnmor wrote:
. . . my trailer came with cheap metric steel shackles. To elaborate on that, it was 5 mm thick steel (.196") but the bolts and springs are sized for 1/4" (.250") thick shackles. The result is .108" excess clearance, that is nearly 1/8 inch and might be what we see here. . . .
That .108 excess clearance is on both sides of the spring too. That comes out to .216" in excess clearance. Almost a full 1/4" excess.
No, I took that into account. There is about 1/16" clearance designed in the assembly, and the springs are made to a minus tolerance. For example; if you have springs that are -.015", the .062" design clearance, and the .054" undersized shackle on each side, the result is .185" slop. I made new parts from better steel, altered the bolt lengths and used good locknuts, giving me .040" total working clearance.
Look at how the cheap locknuts locate on the bolt shoulder when tightened, and you will see one reason why I replaced them.
Sep-27-2016 03:19 PM
Lynnmor wrote:dodge guy wrote:
I don`t care if they are shouldered bolts. a suspension with that much slop will roll around on the springs and hangers. My trailer had shoulder bolts, but they were fitted to the size (width) of the spring. and when tightened down there was only about .020 clearance on each side of the spring. the suspension in the picture is not assembled properly. And you can see the angle of the hanger shackles compared to the nuts/bolts. I really can`t believe the number of people that are calling it OK!!!!!
I agree that is way too much slop, and is not OK. As I mentioned before, my trailer came with cheap metric steel shackles. To elaborate on that, it was 5 mm thick steel (.196") but the bolts and springs are sized for 1/4" (.250") thick shackles. The result is .108" excess clearance, that is nearly 1/8 inch and might be what we see here. Cheap junk for sure, but that is the junk they are selling. Note also that the holes in the shackles are punched in and will wear quickly. I made my own.
Sep-27-2016 01:07 PM
Sep-27-2016 12:14 PM
hohenwald48 wrote:Lynnmor wrote:
. . . my trailer came with cheap metric steel shackles. To elaborate on that, it was 5 mm thick steel (.196") but the bolts and springs are sized for 1/4" (.250") thick shackles. The result is .108" excess clearance, that is nearly 1/8 inch and might be what we see here. . . .
That .108 excess clearance is on both sides of the spring too. That comes out to .216" in excess clearance. Almost a full 1/4" excess.
Sep-27-2016 11:59 AM
Sep-27-2016 08:02 AM
Sep-27-2016 06:31 AM
dodge guy wrote:
I don`t care if they are shouldered bolts. a suspension with that much slop will roll around on the springs and hangers. My trailer had shoulder bolts, but they were fitted to the size (width) of the spring. and when tightened down there was only about .020 clearance on each side of the spring. the suspension in the picture is not assembled properly. And you can see the angle of the hanger shackles compared to the nuts/bolts. I really can`t believe the number of people that are calling it OK!!!!!
Sep-26-2016 07:44 PM
Sep-26-2016 05:51 PM