cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

More fun with tires :-)

budwich
Explorer
Explorer
Lots of threads in the area, but I thought I would drop another on the pile. I have read a number of them and most have their opinion on brands and type (ie. st versus lt)... but was wondering about ply ratings. I have come across the "elevate" brand which indicates an "8 ply" rating on a "C" load range on a 14 inch tire. This seems some what out of "whack" as either the ply rating is over stated or the load range is understate. Am I misunderstanding things or are "marketeers" heading in a new "direction"?
14 REPLIES 14

time2roll
Explorer II
Explorer II
Goodyear Endurance ST is 80 something MPH speed rated.

budwich
Explorer
Explorer
OK... in my limited "net travels", load ratings seem to be well specified with both lettering, weights along with pressures. However, speed ratings seem less so as in cases of none or N/A. Is an "n/a" rating for "ST industry standard" of 65 mph or there is no standard rating, or there is some lettering / rating somewhere on the tire / spec... just have to find it.

time2roll
Explorer II
Explorer II
https://simpletire.com/elevate-trailer-tires

Ply rating seems normal to me within these tires shown.
Note ply rating in parentheses as it is obsolete description.
Regardless pressure and rating in pounds is what matters.
Just another brand trying to make it in the market.... good luck.

westend
Explorer
Explorer
Lwiddis wrote:
I moved to Ds also, westend. The additional capacity is comforting.
Sure is and the price is negligible.
FWIW, I have torsion axles and shock absorbers. There is no big shock to the trailer from the higher PSI tires. An opened can of soda left on the countertop was intact and in the same spot after 100 mi. on the road.
'03 F-250 4x4 CC
'71 Starcraft Wanderstar -- The Cowboy/Hilton

CapriRacer
Explorer II
Explorer II
A little background on the term "Ply Rating".

Way back when, tires were mostly made of cotton thread (and were bias tires) - and pretty standardized thread size and breaking strength. In those days, a tire's strength could be gauged by the number of plies it had.

When synethic fibers came along - notably nylon - the tire could be built with fewer plies and retain the same strength - hence the term "Ply Rating" (PR). Nylon came in a number of strengths and one could build a tire with different number of plies at the same strength. In other words, not only were there fewer plies than with cotton, but a different number of nylon plies depending on how the tire was engineered.

It didn't take very long for people to be confused between ply and PR, so the tire manufacturers created the term "Load Range" and used letters. This occurred in the 1960's. However, many people had a hard time moving on and kept using PR - and kept being confused when the number of plies didn't match the PR number.

So when radial tires were introduced and steel wire became the common belt material, the connection between the number of plies and the PR became even more remote. As an example, over the road truck tires (18 wheeler variety) the common construction is 1 steel body ply and 2 steel belts with perhaps a protector (non-working) belt or 2 (frequently steel as well!)

In the ST and LT tire lineup, the common construction is 2 polyester body plies with 2 steel belts with perhaps a nylon cap ply (or 2).

When tire engineers talk about tire strength, they are referring to the body plies in radial tires. The belts stiffen the tread area, and don't affect the strength of the sidewall. So while an LT tire may have 6 tread plies (2+2+2), it's the sidewall that determines its Load Range - and because of the variety of fibers available, a LR C can have the same number of plies as a LR F.
********************************************************************

CapriRacer

Visit my web site: www.BarrysTireTech.com

rbpru
Explorer
Explorer
As stated ply rating is not often used. The load rating is the most common. With the used of steel and various plastic compositions it seem the "ply" number were phased out.

My tires are rated C at 50 psi and D at 65 psi. At 50 psi they are rated 140 lbs. more than the 7000 lbs. max axle rating; at 65 psi they are more than 1000 lbs. over the axel rating. However they definitely transfer more shock to the TT at 65 psi.

Since the scales tell me that my 7000 lbs. axle pair are only carrying 5600 lbs. when I am loaded for the road, the C rating would be fine but the D rating was only $20.00 more per tire.

I bought the TT used and put over 15,000 miles in three years on the original C rated tires. I changed them because they were 7 years old. I had the D rated tires two months and hit a road hazard that bent the rim, shredded a tire and broke a spring.

Road hazards have very little respect for tire ratings or price. 🙂
Twenty six foot 2010 Dutchmen Lite pulled with a 2011 EcoBoost F-150 4x4.

Just right for Grandpa, Grandma and the dog.

Lwiddis
Explorer
Explorer
I moved to Ds also, westend. The additional capacity is comforting.
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad

westend
Explorer
Explorer
When I purchased Carlisle's for my trailer a few years ago, their ST Radial Trail was available in C and in D load range. I bought the D load range and have been happy with that decision.
'03 F-250 4x4 CC
'71 Starcraft Wanderstar -- The Cowboy/Hilton

budwich
Explorer
Explorer
thanks for the info and comments... I will look thru the listing with the guidance that has been provided here as my tires are getting "there".

camp-n-family
Explorer
Explorer
Kanata Ontario? If you need tires now the Maxxis 8008s are on sale (25 percent off) from the manufacturer. They have good reviews and seem to be well liked on the forums. Order online from Maxxis Canada and they ship to your door for free.
'17 Ram 2500 Crewcab Laramie CTD
'13 Keystone Bullet Premier 310BHPR
Hitched by Hensley

JIMNLIN
Explorer
Explorer
CapriRacer is one of our tire engineers and certainly one to answer your questions.
However a 14" C and D load range ST tire is nothing new or a new direction as you call it.
We've had C and D load range ST tires since the ST tires first became available for light weight trailers (all types) many years ago.

Actually the tire industry still use "ply rating" terminology in their mfg and dealer adds usually such wording as say a 6 ply rated load C tire. Six ply rated doesn't mean six actual plies.
"good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment" ............ Will Rogers

'03 2500 QC Dodge/Cummins HO 3.73 6 speed manual Jacobs Westach
'97 Park Avanue 28' 5er 11200 two slides

troubledwaters
Explorer II
Explorer II
The ply rating is meaningless nowadays. Archaic terminology.

budwich
Explorer
Explorer
I was suspecting a "mistype" in the ad... but I see in others that even carlisle appear to have "multiple rating" for the 14 in size (and others) with both C and D. Is this the "new direction" especially at the 14 inch size which seemed to not have many options left in recent times?

CapriRacer
Explorer II
Explorer II
I suspect a mistype.

PR (Ply Rating) and LR (Load Range) are directly linked with no deviation. The way to tell which is the mistype is to look at the max pressure. As a general rule, LR C have a max pressure of 50 psi, LR D = 65 psi, and LR E = 80 psi (Please note that some sizes have exceptions to this "rule".)
********************************************************************

CapriRacer

Visit my web site: www.BarrysTireTech.com