โSep-30-2017 10:55 AM
Rally's attended so far-21
โOct-09-2017 07:15 AM
โOct-09-2017 07:05 AM
Huntindog wrote:bfast54 wrote:There is a common misconception that a new filter will filter better than an old one. That thinking may have had some merit a long time ago when motors ran a lot dirtier than today.Turtle n Peeps wrote:bfast54 wrote:
When I get back from this next trip I may consider just changing the oil filter and topping it off because I'll be probably around 7000 or so miles Maybe a little more.
Why? :h
Why not go with the recommended 10K your oil analysis company is recommending? They are the experts and you should follow their recommendations. If you don't trust them, then why use them? If you do trust them then why not follow their recommendations?
Okay Apparently you didn't read it well...j
the 10,000 miles that they recommended is that I check it again at ten thousand and see how it is ---now I know darn well that oil filters catch things ----that's their purpose so if I can catch any particles and get rid of them and put a new filter on that --I know I'm money ahead and it's only one quart.
If a filter becomes totally clogged, then a bypass valve will open letting unfiltered oil circulate.. But in today's motors, something would have to be seriously wrong for that to happen. So barring that, a used filter will filter BETTER than a brand new one.
Rally's attended so far-21
โOct-09-2017 06:57 AM
rhagfo wrote:dodge guy wrote:
Hmm lest see, 5k oil changes at $130 or trusting a company to say you can go 10k oil changes and the potential to ruin a motor? Ill take preventative maint. any day! $130 twice a year is cheaper than a motor repair/replacement!
Well I have my oil checked at every change, Blackstone will let you know what is going on inside your engine. Fuel dilution, antifreeze, high metals. I think the $29 is worth the knowledge.
Rally's attended so far-21
โOct-09-2017 06:52 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
OP what was your TBN?
Rally's attended so far-21
โOct-06-2017 08:01 AM
jim1521 wrote:
@GritDog: 2 reasons; 1) because I want to be aware of the status of the engine wear, and 2) In the event of a possible warranty issue I've got an audit trail that would show that it wasn't due to sludge, etc. those reports coupled with the maintenance records would go a long way towards showing that the truck was well maintained.
$30 every six months? That's about the price of a case of beer. Well worth it.
โOct-05-2017 04:52 PM
Durb wrote:Turtle n Peeps wrote:Huntindog wrote:bfast54 wrote:There is a common misconception that a new filter will filter better than an old one. That thinking may have had some merit a long time ago when motors ran a lot dirtier than today.Turtle n Peeps wrote:bfast54 wrote:
When I get back from this next trip I may consider just changing the oil filter and topping it off because I'll be probably around 7000 or so miles Maybe a little more.
Why? :h
Why not go with the recommended 10K your oil analysis company is recommending? They are the experts and you should follow their recommendations. If you don't trust them, then why use them? If you do trust them then why not follow their recommendations?
Okay Apparently you didn't read it well...
the 10,000 miles that they recommended is that I check it again at ten thousand and see how it is ---now I know darn well that oil filters catch things ----that's their purpose so if I can catch any particles and get rid of them and put a new filter on that --I know I'm money ahead and it's only one quart.
If a filter becomes totally clogged, then a bypass valve will open letting unfiltered oil circulate.. But in today's motors, something would have to be seriously wrong for that to happen. So barring that, a used filter will filter BETTER than a brand new one.
Dog, I tried to explain this many times in this forum but some of the sheep here would have no part of it. I also said the same thing about fuel filters with mostly the same reaction. And fuel filters don't even have a by-pass. :R
Interjection from one of the sheep here. I assume you never change your filters as they just become more effective the dirtier they get. Possibly filter manufacturers should sell used filters for a premium because they filter better than a new one. You might have been the same one that postured that dirty oil was better for engine longevity than clean oil. Fact is, one doesn't know when a filter goes to bypass. It could be when the oil is more viscous when cold or the filter is really dirty. Some of the bypass valve designs I have seen supply oil directly to the engine from the dirty side of the filtering media. The valve will close and the filter will catch the dirt on the return trip then might open again. Please continue with your urban myth, I will continue to change my filters.
โOct-05-2017 04:11 PM
โOct-05-2017 03:34 PM
Grit dog wrote:
Jim1521, maybe I'm stating the obvious, but if you have a lifetime powertrain warranty, one of the few things it covers is the internals of the engine (and maybe turbo), so why spend the $ for oil analysis if you get a new engine for free when/if it blows up or wears out?
Under normal circumstances, oil analysis doesn't provide an easy button to change a major operating characteristic if you start eating parts, it just tells you that you're eating parts and I doubt a dealer would give you a new engine based on advanced warning thru black stone reports.
โOct-05-2017 03:24 PM
โOct-05-2017 03:03 PM
Turtle n Peeps wrote:Huntindog wrote:bfast54 wrote:There is a common misconception that a new filter will filter better than an old one. That thinking may have had some merit a long time ago when motors ran a lot dirtier than today.Turtle n Peeps wrote:bfast54 wrote:
When I get back from this next trip I may consider just changing the oil filter and topping it off because I'll be probably around 7000 or so miles Maybe a little more.
Why? :h
Why not go with the recommended 10K your oil analysis company is recommending? They are the experts and you should follow their recommendations. If you don't trust them, then why use them? If you do trust them then why not follow their recommendations?
Okay Apparently you didn't read it well...
the 10,000 miles that they recommended is that I check it again at ten thousand and see how it is ---now I know darn well that oil filters catch things ----that's their purpose so if I can catch any particles and get rid of them and put a new filter on that --I know I'm money ahead and it's only one quart.
If a filter becomes totally clogged, then a bypass valve will open letting unfiltered oil circulate.. But in today's motors, something would have to be seriously wrong for that to happen. So barring that, a used filter will filter BETTER than a brand new one.
Dog, I tried to explain this many times in this forum but some of the sheep here would have no part of it. I also said the same thing about fuel filters with mostly the same reaction. And fuel filters don't even have a by-pass. :R
โOct-05-2017 02:01 PM
Huntindog wrote:bfast54 wrote:There is a common misconception that a new filter will filter better than an old one. That thinking may have had some merit a long time ago when motors ran a lot dirtier than today.Turtle n Peeps wrote:bfast54 wrote:
When I get back from this next trip I may consider just changing the oil filter and topping it off because I'll be probably around 7000 or so miles Maybe a little more.
Why? :h
Why not go with the recommended 10K your oil analysis company is recommending? They are the experts and you should follow their recommendations. If you don't trust them, then why use them? If you do trust them then why not follow their recommendations?
Okay Apparently you didn't read it well...
the 10,000 miles that they recommended is that I check it again at ten thousand and see how it is ---now I know darn well that oil filters catch things ----that's their purpose so if I can catch any particles and get rid of them and put a new filter on that --I know I'm money ahead and it's only one quart.
If a filter becomes totally clogged, then a bypass valve will open letting unfiltered oil circulate.. But in today's motors, something would have to be seriously wrong for that to happen. So barring that, a used filter will filter BETTER than a brand new one.
โOct-05-2017 01:48 PM
โOct-03-2017 04:38 PM
bfast54 wrote:There is a common misconception that a new filter will filter better than an old one. That thinking may have had some merit a long time ago when motors ran a lot dirtier than today.Turtle n Peeps wrote:bfast54 wrote:
When I get back from this next trip I may consider just changing the oil filter and topping it off because I'll be probably around 7000 or so miles Maybe a little more.
Why? :h
Why not go with the recommended 10K your oil analysis company is recommending? They are the experts and you should follow their recommendations. If you don't trust them, then why use them? If you do trust them then why not follow their recommendations?
Okay Apparently you didn't read it well...
the 10,000 miles that they recommended is that I check it again at ten thousand and see how it is ---now I know darn well that oil filters catch things ----that's their purpose so if I can catch any particles and get rid of them and put a new filter on that --I know I'm money ahead and it's only one quart.
โOct-03-2017 12:50 PM
bfast54 wrote:
I have just over 5,000 miles on the oil everything came back absolutely spectacular --basically its... no antifreeze, almost zero zero fuel dilution into the oil Basically zero soot,,,all that good stuff ..
....My truck has over 300,000 miles on it.