Saw this on the web....

[Ric_Flair]

Looks like a truck camper, thought it belonged here. The green energy initiatives meets RVing.

[1jogger]

How about the other guy with the flatbed, he looks jealous!

[BradW]

kohldad wrote:

Too heavy for an srw.

But it is on a DRW bicycle.

DRW Bicycle or SRW Tricycle? That's heavy. I will have to think about that one for a while.

http://www.zhongguosyzs.com/news/11325598.html

http://gigazine.net/news/20110421_camper_bike/

[mlts22]

No W/D hitch, trailer brakes, nor anti-sway present...

[serpa4]

I wonder what his tires are rated for?
It might be slow, it's only one person-power.

[kohldad]

Too heavy for an srw.

But it is on a DRW bicycle.

[amandasgramma]

Could be me, but I think the weight police need to be called in. 🙂

[Ric_Flair]

I see your logic. Instead of the camper hauling the toys, it's the toy hauling the camper.

Note to moderator: please feel to move as you see fit. 🙂

[54suds]

don't think it belongs here, it's not a truck camper, but a bicycle camper. Maybe the Toy Haulers forums?

Later
C
x2

[BradW]

Too heavy for an srw. He'll likely kill a bus load of orphans with that rig.

[Tarkin75]

I don't think it belongs here, it's not a truck camper, but a bicycle camper. Maybe the Toy Haulers forums?

Later
C

[Pathfinder450]

Well I guess the only other complain besides the bed and bathroom being so small is in the kitchen. It's so small that if you change your mind what to cook you have to leave the camper to change the menu. Hehe. Sorry that's the first thing I thought of when seeing this.

[Eycom]

I don't think I could maintain my 10-2-5 full timing RV lifestyle with that rig.