โMay-03-2020 08:46 AM
โJun-08-2020 06:44 AM
Slowmover wrote:djsamuel wrote:Slowmover wrote:
An Andersen shouldnโt ever be considered if a WDH is needed. It isnโt one.
.
Seriously? The Andersen is a great WDH in the proper applications. In applications where there is a high tongue weight and a lot of redistribution is required, then the Andersen is not the best choice. However, for many applications the Andersen is an outstanding choice. It's worked great for me over the last 6 years.
Numbers.
Opinions ainโt worth much otherwise.
Very likely your rig also in need of help.
There are formulas which predict how WDH works. Basic engineering. Meet them first.
Anything that makes the day on the road easier is worth the trouble. Hitch rigging isnโt met with success by even 3% of owners.
Start over with what you have.
.
.
โJun-08-2020 06:18 AM
Slowmover wrote:
Numbers.
Opinions ainโt worth much otherwise.
Very likely your rig also in need of help.
There are formulas which predict how WDH works. Basic engineering. Meet them first.
Anything that makes the day on the road easier ..is worth the trouble. Hitch rigging isnโt met with success by even 3% of owners.
Start over with what you have.
โJun-07-2020 01:31 PM
djsamuel wrote:Slowmover wrote:
An Andersen shouldnโt ever be considered if a WDH is needed. It isnโt one.
.
Seriously? The Andersen is a great WDH in the proper applications. In applications where there is a high tongue weight and a lot of redistribution is required, then the Andersen is not the best choice. However, for many applications the Andersen is an outstanding choice. It's worked great for me over the last 6 years.
โJun-07-2020 01:03 PM
01tundra wrote:Slowmover wrote:
An Andersen shouldnโt ever be considered if a WDH is needed. It isnโt one.
An Andersen No-Sway WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION hitch is exactly that, a weight distribution hitch that also incorporates sway control.
I've used one for several years with a few different trailers and tow vehicles. It may not be as efficient at returning weight to the front end of the tow vehicle when used with heavy trailers (i.e., tongue weights greater than 1,000 lbs), but for sub 1,000 lb tongue weights the hitch works wonderful and it absolutely is a weight distribution hitch.
โMay-14-2020 02:47 PM
Slowmover wrote:
Shock load on receiver. Equalizer inferior. Crude
โMay-14-2020 07:58 AM
Slowmover wrote:
An Andersen shouldnโt ever be considered if a WDH is needed. It isnโt one.
.
โMay-13-2020 06:12 AM
Slowmover wrote:
An Andersen shouldnโt ever be considered if a WDH is needed. It isnโt one.
โMay-11-2020 05:48 PM
LarryJM wrote:Slowmover wrote:
Equalizer brand NOT as good. Period.
And that statement is Pure BULL ... PERIOD! PERIOD!
Both the Equal-i-zer and Reese Dual Cam are performance wise equal to one another when properly set up and matched to the TT loads and the choice is a matter of personal preferences.
The one single adavantage of the Reese is that it can be had in a 1700lb TW version whereas the Equal-i-zer maxes out at 1400.
Larry
โMay-11-2020 05:06 AM
Slowmover wrote:
Equalizer brand NOT as good. Period.
โMay-09-2020 06:47 PM
โMay-09-2020 04:11 PM
โMay-09-2020 11:37 AM
โMay-09-2020 11:27 AM
mikeratz wrote:
From the reviews I looked at I like the Equalizer. It's also a lower profile and my trailer is fairly low (the Reece dual cam does hang down a bit. Had one a few trailers ago)
Also according to the Equalizer website you only add behind the axle cargo weight? (I've always used all passengers and truck cargo)
Slowmover wrote:
Of the obsolete hitch types (non-Hensley patent) the original WDH is still the best. The Reese Dual Cam. (An Equalizer IS NOT in its class).
โMay-09-2020 11:19 AM