Nov-14-2014 11:45 AM
Nov-16-2014 11:33 AM
Nov-15-2014 01:56 PM
Nov-15-2014 01:22 PM
Nov-15-2014 07:54 AM
Nov-15-2014 07:38 AM
Nov-15-2014 06:53 AM
dave17352 wrote:Kohldadsr wrote:
Welcome to the net, I don't post much but I read a lot so let me through in 2 more cents. Why not have both if you can afford it. I have a 35 ft FW and a 11 ft TC. I enjoy both but for different reasons. I use the FW for longer trips of longer duration. I just completed a 5K trip in the TC and found it very comfortable. One caveat is I am traveling by myself. Have fun no mater what you do.
That is what we did.
Nov-15-2014 06:38 AM
Nov-15-2014 05:40 AM
Nov-15-2014 04:01 AM
dave17352 wrote:Kohldadsr wrote:
Welcome to the net, I don't post much but I read a lot so let me through in 2 more cents. Why not have both if you can afford it. I have a 35 ft FW and a 11 ft TC. I enjoy both but for different reasons. I use the FW for longer trips of longer duration. I just completed a 5K trip in the TC and found it very comfortable. One caveat is I am traveling by myself. Have fun no mater what you do.
That is what we did.
Nov-14-2014 04:47 PM
kohldad wrote:
The FW / TC debate is also about traveling style. FW is definitely a park and explore returning every day to a base camp. Yes you can do some exploring between base camps, but always have to be careful. You have to pack food up for snacks during the day and have a plan for your pit stops.
With the TC, you have the choice of moseying along each day without doubling back or setting up a base camp. Unless you have dropped off the camper, you have your food and pit stop with you where ever you go. And if the go turns out to be a dead end, just back up. This is the route we plan on going for the first couple of years after retirement before reconsidering the FW option.
Since you already have the TC and truck, you could put all of your stuff in a small storage locker for a couple of month while you travel in the TC. If you like it, get rid of the stuff or continue with the rental. If you don't, then switch over to a FW.
2004.5 Ram SLT LB 3500 DRW Quad Cab 4x4
1988 Bigfoot (C11.5) TC (1900# w/standard equip. per decal), 130 watts solar, 100 AH AGM, Polar Cub A/C, EU2000i Honda
Toad: 91 Zuke
Nov-14-2014 04:46 PM
Nov-14-2014 03:49 PM
Kohldadsr wrote:
Welcome to the net, I don't post much but I read a lot so let me through in 2 more cents. Why not have both if you can afford it. I have a 35 ft FW and a 11 ft TC. I enjoy both but for different reasons. I use the FW for longer trips of longer duration. I just completed a 5K trip in the TC and found it very comfortable. One caveat is I am traveling by myself. Have fun no mater what you do.
Nov-14-2014 03:44 PM
Nov-14-2014 02:24 PM
QA Boomer wrote:
especially the one about the space in the bed area.........that was pretty funny, Jim!