Jun-25-2015 09:08 PM
Jun-27-2015 10:52 AM
Jun-27-2015 09:01 AM
Jun-26-2015 09:56 PM
hohenwald48 wrote:
I think a lot of municipalities have a problem with this. Some more than others. A family moves into a RV park, sets up housekeeping, uses the fire, police and public school systems and don't pay any property tax to cover their fair share of those expenses. Governments are doing what they can to recover those costs and I think they should. It's only fair to the other tax payers.
Property taxes to the RV park owner don't cover those costs so they don't get passed on to the resident. RV parks are intended for tourists not full time residents. If you tie it down you are no longer a tourist.
I think some states (WA I believe) even have a limit on the number of nights you can use an RV before it gets reclassified as a full time residence and taxed accordingly.
Jun-26-2015 09:44 PM
BubbaChris wrote:
Governments need money to run, and provide services.
You've obviously run across a boundary point that is important to your local government. And they've determined that a park model effectively being treated as a manufactured home is worthy of appropriate fees/taxes.
Sorry you ran into this speed bump in your plans. When you consider the big picture, I hope you make an appropriate choice and are able to enjoy your new home.
Jun-26-2015 10:33 AM
Jun-26-2015 10:05 AM
Jun-26-2015 09:00 AM
Old-Biscuit wrote:
Forget about 'tying it down'
Travel Trailer/Park model is NOT built like a Mobile Home or Manufactured Home.
Tie Downs in dirt will only give YOU the false sense of safety.
Hurricane will just rip out those tie downs flip that trailer over.
IF hurricane happens you should already be gone to a SAFE place. NOT in that trailer.
Tie downs -----permanent--- are labor intensive, expensive and MUST be done to code
Jun-26-2015 08:34 AM
Jun-26-2015 07:15 AM
Jun-26-2015 06:05 AM
Jun-26-2015 05:38 AM
Jun-26-2015 05:25 AM
Jun-26-2015 04:23 AM
Jun-26-2015 03:35 AM