FLgator01
Explorer
Joined 8 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
All Activity
Re: Something Amiss Here
Hank MI wrote: Good Sam Care Team wrote: FLgator01 and all, Thank you all for your time and interest in the forum and threads. I would like to clarify any confusion on why threads are closed. We will close a thread if we have no activity within 24 hours of the last post. If a thread was closed due to no activity and people would still like to discuss said topic. At any time a member can start a new thread with the same topic. Threads are not deleted but only closed. At anytime if you have questions or concerns please feel free to reach out to me or my team. Thank you, Mark Interesting and confusing. Last post to this thread was on 12/26, it's now 1/7 and it's still open. Seems inconsistent. Also, what is the benefit to the forum of closing a thread? Don't understand the thinking there as other forums I frequent never close a thread unless of course it gets out of hand. Maybe if I keep posting it will stay open.0Views0likes0CommentsRe: Firearms into Canada
GordonThree wrote: I thought the 2nd amendment recognized the right to form a militia for the security of the state and those people in the militia have the right to have and bear arms. There is a lot of debate about what the writers of the Constitution were actually thinking when they conceived of and wrote it. If you want to think the 2nd Amendment was written to mean this militia was intended to have the same weapons as the federal military then you would have to think the common citizenary would be allowed to posses F-22 fighters, nuclear armament, etc. in the 1700's the militia consisted of men between the ages of 18 and I think 49. And that militia was to be well regulated. So does that mean only men of those ages should be allowed to own weapons? I don't know. A lot of questions. I don't have a problem with folks being able to own weapons. But those weapons should and the owners should be well regulated. As to the OP's original questions; I wouldn't take your weapons into Canada. Many people have given you several options. Weigh those options and hopefully you will make the right decision. Happy travels.447Views0likes0CommentsRe: Firearms into Canada
The OP asked a simple question. Can I take take my weapons into Canada and if not what do I do with them. The question was asked and answered. Now the thread has morphed into how unfair individual states laws are concerning the 2 Amendment. How are these laws unfair? The Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. Some folks are complaining that some states by restricting the amount of rounds allowed, their Constitutional rights are being abridged. How so? Are you not allowed to bear arms? What do you think you need to protect you and your family. I'm 67 years old. Fulltimed for 5 years. Boondocked. Traveled East to West and North to South several times. I have never been in a situation where I felt I needed a firearm. But if you feel you need one, that is your business. But you do not need a semi automatic weapon that is capable of holding a 10+ round magazine.446Views0likes0CommentsRe: Something Amiss Here
K Charles wrote: I just checked some locked threads, the first one I saw was about shipping costs, it open more then a month and went 19 days without a response. The second one never got a response. I get just what I pay for when I use this site and see nothing wrong with a thread closed for inactivity. The three I was referring to, two were open three days and one was open one day. Just seemed strange that three threads that were negative of GS and were closed within a few days. Maybe I didn't read the rules well enough.0Views0likes0Comments
Groups
Full Time RVers
Thinking about becoming a full-time RVer? Ask the experts.Dec 28, 20241,587 Posts Motorhome Group
Join in here to discuss all things motorhomes.Feb 17, 202538,707 Posts
