briansue wrote:
ridiculous claims.
Based on your post we have to assume you have spent many years diving in the Caribbean and have years of log books to substantiate your claim that the temperatures haven't risen. I guess our thermometers and all our friends thermometers are not as accurate as yours. We have also seen the coral dying as the scientists use stakes and rope to mark off specific areas of the reefs to study them and the deterioration. I also have years of video of the same reefs. But I am sure you have much more information than I do. And I am sure you can also dispute with scientific proof the 97% or the world's scientists who also say temps are rising. Note - ocean temps in specific areas are probably similar to weather changes - and again the argument that weather and climate are not the same. When scientists say ocean temps rise they are talking about the entire planet while I am talking about a specific area. The fact that reefs die is reason enough for concern. Note also that scientists make some of their hurricane predictions based on ocean temps and they put that info out every year prior to hurricane season. But don't bother to do any research because you might learn something.
Ocean temperatures at any one location is much more dependent on local conditions rather than "climate change". It is pure fact, that no one can say they personally have experienced climate change due to the temperature at a given location. The reefs you reference could have died from pollution, a cooling trend, a shift in the gulf stream, a storm disturbing the seafloor, military exercises, disease, tourists diving in the area and damaging the coral and who knows what else. Blaming "global warming" or "climate change" is merely an uneducated guess.
And those hurricane forecasts sure have been accurate. I thought the east coast should have been destroyed by monster storms by now. That was the impression the "Global Warming" advocates were conveying, before it became "climate change". If you were to "do any research", you would see that in the last few years the hurricane forecasts have actually been very inaccurate. So either their models or their data is wrong. And if the forecast models or data are wrong, who is to say the climate change models or data are also not accurate.
Accurate temperature records reach back only a couple of hundred years, at best. The earth has been around for several billion years. A two hundred year sample is, by definition, insufficient to make statistically accurate conclusions. I have not been convinced, one way or the other, simply because the data used to draw all these conclusions are sketchy, at best.