CFerguson wrote:
I agree that we should all vote. But wouldn't it be nice if there was actually a CHOICE between Tweedledum and Tweedledumber?
Both parties are Tax + Spend. Only difference is who they try to shift the taxes onto. I do fear for today's young'uns.
About the only things that will thrive with no help from people are weeds and roaches.
Well, the first step is tell Tweedledum what you expect them to do for you. Look at who is renting him, let him decide what is more important, their money or your vote. Next, keep track of what he does to/for you. In a couple of years, he has not made you happy, get involved in the primary process, find somebody less dumb. (stores full potted plants, LOL)
jdb7566 wrote:
Gas taxes are a never ending folly. EVERYBODY benefits from the road and highway system, but the burden to pay for them fall on those who actually drive on them.
Since the Arab oil embargo of the 70's, our Government has increased CAFE standards on a continual basis. Using less gasoline is good for the environment, less gasoline sales=less tax collected=less road maintenance, and the cycle continues. Many locales are discussing a tax on mileage driven. There again, the burden of road repair will fall on only those who drive on them. I guess that's the price you pay to be part of a mobile society.
The people that use roads most pays most, but everybody pays fuel taxes. Every time raw material move down the road, fuel tax is paid and added to the cost. Every time a partly finished product moves, fuel tax is paid and added to the cost. Move factory to distribution center,fuel tax is paid and added to the cost. To the store, fuel tax is paid and added to the cost. Just like higher fuel prices for any other reason, you pay for it every time the cash register rings. The only difference is if the increase comes from a increase in taxes, the people get a choice about how it is spent.
IMHO, the main mistake made was at the time of embargo the tax, in cent per gallon should of been converted to % of $ like sales tax on everything else is. For every mile driven, I'm burning less fuel, but paying more money. And a much smaller percentage is going for highways. If the tax was a percentage of cost, then it would of kept up with inflation. The increase in fuel cost might have forced more people to buy more efficient.