magicbus wrote:
What would be your "cohesive national response"? The needs and resources of people who, like you, reside in Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard are vastly different than a 7-11 clerk in Alta, Oklahoma.
You might try living here before you start making statements like that. You are clearly convinced that everyone on the Islands must be wealthy, when the reality is that is far from true of the year round resident population. On top of that many of our workers work seasonally (80 hours a week in season) and therefore still haven’t been able to collect their unemployment “bonus”.
As for a cohesive plan, the governors of most of the New England states plus NY and NJ agreed early on to work this problem in concert. Have you looked at a Covid map of densely populated areas recently? So far the open slowly but surely seems to be working far better than “hey everybody, the heck with the virus, let’s get back to work.” I guess time will tell.
Dave
The median household income in Nantucket county is $83,000 compared to the US median income of $59,000. The average value of an owner occupied home is $1,030,000. In 2017, the last year I could find a statistic for, the average selling price of a home was $2,150,000. Cry me a river about how poor Nantucket County is.
And as soon as any region of the US surpasses the deaths from or confirmed cases of COVID19 per 100,000 residents that NY, NJ, CT and MA have, you might have an argument they handled it better. But as of right now, there is a long, long way to go before that becomes true. I would argue the current situation shows those other states handled COVID in a much better way. Their peaks are coming when there is a much greater supply of PPE and a greater understanding of the therapeutics that are showing to be successful. Out of the 134,320 deaths currently attributed to COVID those 4 states account for 60,188. That's 44.8% of all deaths, while at the same time those 4 states make up only about 12.1% of the US Population. Strange way to measure success.