Caught in a donut hole. Do you feel the same?
We are spending a few months in the San Jose area. We found that every rv resort is the same, with one exception (Coyote Valley RV Park). In short, they are not RV resorts but neighborhoods of ru...
Forum Discussion
"Their waiting list is very long. Go Figure.."
----
Not hard to "figure" at all; there are *very few* RV park options of any kind, for anybody, for any purpose in the Bay Area as a whole, and the demand for space, particularly long-term rental, is extremely high. Simple "market economics".
The "local" (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Redwood City, East SJ RV parks), with the possible exception of Coyote, which is a mixed bag, are not destination parks or "resorts"; they're primarily for short and/or long-term residents who are usually working in the area. They'd close up if they had to depend on transient/traveling RVers for steady income.
No, the places don't have to be dumps, but "dumpiness control" is a management/maintenance/rule enforcement issue, and some parks are better managed than others. :R
----
Not hard to "figure" at all; there are *very few* RV park options of any kind, for anybody, for any purpose in the Bay Area as a whole, and the demand for space, particularly long-term rental, is extremely high. Simple "market economics".
The "local" (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Redwood City, East SJ RV parks), with the possible exception of Coyote, which is a mixed bag, are not destination parks or "resorts"; they're primarily for short and/or long-term residents who are usually working in the area. They'd close up if they had to depend on transient/traveling RVers for steady income.
No, the places don't have to be dumps, but "dumpiness control" is a management/maintenance/rule enforcement issue, and some parks are better managed than others. :R
