Campfire Time wrote:
So what are you saying? That just because it's not spelled out that it's safe? Do you need a sign in addition to "Road Closed" to tell you why it's closed? Of course not, you know proceeding could be bad for you. "No Swimming" is also pretty straight forward.
Unfortunately, there is a large percentage of the population that needs... DEMANDS... exact details of everything. If the details aren't expressed displayed, the rules don't apply to them. I learned this from over 12 years in patrol as a police officer.
We had a bad flood about a decade ago, a large portion of a major highway was completely submerged in flood waters. We had the road closed, blocked by marked police cruisers and supplemented by large State Road trucks, because people were trying to drive through the cones and flares. Well, after dark some guy decided that the rules didn't apply to him. The road was COMPLETELY blocked with vehicles, but to his defense we didn't have any signs that said the road was submerged.
This guy turned off his lights and drove down the wrong way in the opposite lanes of traffic (which weren't blocked...) and drove straight into the flood waters. His car was swept downstream and his body was found miles down the road a week later.
Some people just cannot take in the information at hand and make a logical conclusion. They need the conclusion solved and spelled out in at least 2 languages and posted every 10 feet before they are even willing to begin to accept responsibility for the information.
It blows my mind that people are so willing to deflect blame away the parents in this case. You have some touchy-feeling folks here that feel bad for what happened, so they refuse to assign blame because what happened was so tragic. The problem is that when you don't accept responsibility for your mistakes, those mistakes continue to get made by somebody else, and somebody else, and somebody else. If we had personal responsibility and blamed the correct people, perhaps we would see less of these events.