JRS & B wrote:
Quick after thought, I never heard of the 10 mile rule.
We looked at homes in the Pensacola area that were probably no more than one mile, two at the most, from the Gulf. But they were located on one of the few hills in the area. So at a grand elevation of 27 feet above sea level they required no flood insurance.
If you build to the proper flood zone level either by bringing in fill dirt, or building a stem wall, then flood insurance should only run about $500 a year, regardless of how close or far you are from the water.Now velocity zones are a different matter.
What year were you looking at property?
The commission report and decision on home owners insurance just finished up late this past year. A lot of changes were approved.
Bored to tears this past year I watched the entire live feed of Citizens Insurance report/request to the government regarding ins policies, rates, and zones. VEDDY interesting I might add all what was brought up and decided on during this commission report. Esxpeically about even if you were able to get insurance all what they didn't have to pay you when anything happened. Surprised that since this was public access that none of it hit the media.
Bottom line in 'laymen's' terms if a property is within the waters edge of a coast it is a risk for hurricane damage. Flood, velocity terms were merged and muddied so they did not have to insure anyone on the coast.
Needless to say private providers are using this as a form of a precident to refuse coverage to certain of their policy holders.