GoPackGo wrote:
I don't disagree with your statement because I haven't visited either, but B's has only one review and it's over a year old so there's a flag. The other has two raters, with one person loving the place and the other not liking it at all - thus the '7' rating. So which is correct ? - I would lean towards the negative review because it has more detail. Still, with only 2 reviews . . .
You gotta read the reviews to get a feel for the place !
The more people that review a place, the better one can determine what it's really like.
Many people on this forum like and use RVPARKREVIEWS.COM. I'm not trying to defend it and have no vested interest. It's just the best one I've found.
I think the reviews and ratings for Presnells are very helpful. Ar first glance the 7+ rating seems a little low, but if you read the reviews (13) you find out that there are newer owners that have completely renovated and improved the place. All newer reviews are very high, while older reviews (old ownwers ?) rate it much lower (no sewer hookups, etc).
GPG,
Hopefully I didn't come off as though I was sniping; definitely wasn't the case. I've used RVPARKREVIEWS.COM as well in the past, and I use them as well. The problem is that you've really got to apply a fine eye to picking a camp site. As you said, only one post in a year - when it's a very flattering post, it makes me wonder who actually wrote the review.