SDcampowneroperator wrote:
If you read through all of the OPs postings on this subject, you will get the drift. Administrators for the rvpr.com site obviously saw the review did not meet criteria.
The admin's of the site are rvers like you and me.
Thanks, to ( ) an rvpr.com volunteer admin., a member here, on the ops original thread, for the education on what you voluntarily do.
Interesting information here...although I'm not sure what was edited out by the mod...I'm pretty sure I've got enough of the story to understand...The person blocking MY posting on RVParkReviews is the same person here that got my original thread on this particular CG locked down with his bickering and arguing here...now I know why he was so persistent in his confrontational posts.
I appreciate that someone is a "volunteer"...but I sense a trend here also that TWO park owners are defending both the RVParkReviews procedures of protecting the parks as well as defending this particular parks loose reservation policy (and I use the term "reservation" very lightly)...interesting stuff for sure...