Forum Discussion
westernrvparkow
Aug 07, 2019Explorer
JRscooby wrote:Good for Cuba, though I cannot find any documentation that it actually happened. There were citations that cuba pledged 1000s of doctors for Syrian aid, but in actuality sent 256 along with 2 tons of medical supplies to settle a debt Cuba owed the Syrian government.westernrvparkowner wrote:
I cannot say with any certainty that the US acting as world policeman is a great idea, but 80 years ago the collective world though it was a great idea to practice "mind our own business" and we ended up with Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan. A similiar outcome with the added threat of nuclear weapons is a world no one shoul even contemplate.
You might want to think about you history. Look at what military spending levels '39 compared to total worldwide military spending. Then look then and now, who is trying to dictate what the rest of the world wants to do. Better drop this line of talk.
BTW, somebody mentioned humanitarian aid. A while back a ebola outbreak someplace in Africa. Evening news, bragging US sending 3,000 Marines. Later BBC was thanking Cuba for sending 3000 Doctors...
As for military spending, there is little correlation between military spending and military aggression. Iran and North Korea are both proven to be threats to regional stability in areas vital to the world's economy. It is in the interests of the US to keep both of those regimes in check. If that requires military presence in the strait of Hormuz and the Korean DMZ that is a price I feel is reasonable to pay.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,739 PostsLatest Activity: Dec 08, 2025