" Recently I read a article about the NFS cracking down on people abusing the forest by living in them. The rule works out to if you don't have a residential address that you can't spend even a night in a NF because it is illegal to live in them. You must be living there since you have no other home and it applies to even the big rigs since they full time. So the next time a ranger ask where you live and you proudly say your shiny motor home, you may be ticketed and asked to leave."
So..the people that act as Hosts in the various parks..the ones that full-time...they gotta leave too? Coo..I want to see that.
"That is a pretty fine line. I have definitely seen people fulltiming in class C RVs on city streets that I would consider homeless. I guess for me the dividing line is whether you can afford other options".
Am I correct, that in the posters view, as long as person has 'other options' they are superior to anyone else and they can live on the street, but not if they don't have "other options".
There are so many people that have lost everything. Some due to the monetary/banking collapse. Some due to the closing of plants. Some due to other circumstances. How utterly arrogant to condemn those less fortunate. Do you look down your nose at them as you drive by? Do you speak poorly of them? Those of us that are 'ok'..we are SO fortunate. It is important to remember that.
Gary Haupt