Forum Discussion
highplainsdrift
Mar 24, 2016Explorer
LenSatic wrote:4runnerguy wrote:
From my point of view, you'd have greater redress than through any state entity. Since my point of view has the same amount of facts as your response, it's every bit as valid.
"Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're out to get you"
Did you miss the part where I actually went through this with the state of AZ and it was cleared up in, roughly, 3 months? I consider that "facts". Our U.S. Congressman represented 600,000 people at the time. Do you really think he'd care about my piddly problem?
BTW, I notice a deflection of topic onto my small example rather than the larger issue first raised. At least deflect to the Shoshone as their issue is far more relevant.
LS
You can quit with the Shoshone question. I am not going to answer it. Your first hero was Cliven Bundy. That pretty much says it all.
And yes most of my posts have been about saving our public land. I absolutely, positively stand federal lands proud!!
I have a different hero: "Here is your Country. Cherish these natural wonders, cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and romance as sacred heritage, for your children and your children's children. Do let selfish men or greedy interests skin your country of its beauty, its riches or its romance." Theodore Roosevelt
It is time for all federal land users to decide if their heart lies closer to Cliven Bundy or to Theodore Roosevelt. I am confident the majority will go with Teddy.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,739 PostsLatest Activity: Jun 11, 2015